Donate Now
and become
Forum Supporter.
Many perks! <...more...>
|
12-30-2016, 10:14 PM
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 175
|
|
Need help deciphering label: Missing a "(" somewhere.
I just bought a new plant at Trader Joe's and looking more carefully at the label, I realize there is the problem of a missing '(' somewhere in the name.
What are the possible places it might belong? And does this make the parentage ambiguous?
Paph. Supersuk 'Eureka' AM/AOS x
Paph. Raisin Pie 'Hsinying) x Sib
The label is written as shown, with the first line indented in relation to the second. Also, the "Paph." on the second line is blurred, with the "P" almost completely missing.
Thanks!
Last edited by plantluvver; 12-30-2016 at 10:23 PM..
Reason: Attached photos
|
Post Thanks / Like - 2 Likes
|
|
|
12-31-2016, 12:57 AM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2015
Zone: 9b
Location: Phoenix AZ - Lower Sonoran Desert
Posts: 18,721
|
|
I bought one of these a while back. Others were most helpful. Yours looks different from mine, but that is what would be expected from a sib cross:
Paphiopedilum (Supersuk x Raisin Pie) x sib
|
12-31-2016, 03:19 AM
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Somerset, UK
Posts: 122
|
|
What you have is Paph Hsinying Alien
First to answer your question the missing ) can only go as shown in the first reply.Or to be more precise it should go before the P of the first word Paph. However (Raisin Pie x Supersuk) is Hsinying Alien and so you have (Hsinying Alien x self) which is Hsinying Alien
Last edited by cricketerry; 12-31-2016 at 03:26 AM..
Reason: Adding extra info
|
Post Thanks / Like - 1 Likes
|
|
|
12-31-2016, 05:44 PM
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 175
|
|
Thanks!
Both of your replies were very helpful. I am looking forward to seeing the flower when it fully opens.
I think you have also answered a naming question that occurred to me in reading some forum posts. But I want to be sure I am correct: When a grex is assigned, any further crosses within that grex share the same grex name, so the grex includes any further sibling crosses. Is this true?
Thanks!
|
Post Thanks / Like - 1 Likes
|
|
|
12-31-2016, 07:50 PM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2015
Zone: 9b
Location: Phoenix AZ - Lower Sonoran Desert
Posts: 18,721
|
|
Yes, crossing two different plants with the same grex name, or selfing a plant, results in progeny with the same grex name.
|
01-01-2017, 06:22 PM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2013
Zone: 7a
Location: North Plainfield, NJ
Posts: 2,827
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by plantluvver
Thanks!
Both of your replies were very helpful. I am looking forward to seeing the flower when it fully opens.
I think you have also answered a naming question that occurred to me in reading some forum posts. But I want to be sure I am correct: When a grex is assigned, any further crosses within that grex share the same grex name, so the grex includes any further sibling crosses. Is this true?
Thanks!
|
If you want to be specific, the original cross is F1.
When you sib cross it, it retains the name but becomes F2.
If it is sibbed again, F3, and so on.
__________________
Kim (Fair Orchids)
Founder of SPCOP (Society to Prevention of Cruelty to Orchid People), with the goal of barring the taxonomists from tinkering with established genera!
I am neither a 'lumper' nor a 'splitter', but I refuse to re-write millions of labels.
|
Post Thanks / Like - 1 Likes
|
|
|
Tags
|
missing, label, paph, line, written, raisin, eureka, supersuk, am/aos, pie, hsinying, sib, indented, blurred, completely, ambiguous, relation, shown, joes, carefully, realize, trader, plant, deciphering, bought |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:43 AM.
|