Donate Now
and become
Forum Supporter.
Many perks! <...more...>
|
07-24-2014, 02:07 PM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2013
Zone: 7a
Location: North Plainfield, NJ
Posts: 2,817
|
|
Paph Harrisianum
I have two clones of this old (first) primary hybrid. It is Paph barbatum x Paph villosum, registered in 1869.
I have bloomed G.S.Ball's variety (4N) several times. It is a somewhat slow grower, which is not uncommon for 4N plants. The fans are about the size of an average to large sized Maudiae.
The second plant has much smaller fans (6-8"), and is a better grower, but it has not bloomed till now. I am guessing that the dorsal might roll back a little more as the flower matures.
|
Post Thanks / Like - 4 Likes
|
|
|
07-24-2014, 02:21 PM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2013
Zone: 7a
Location: North Plainfield, NJ
Posts: 2,817
|
|
In case anyone is wondering, there is some ambiguity as to how old the G S Ball variety is. One author states, that the first reference in a book dates to after WWII.
I have found a mention of an orchid exhibit by G. S. Ball, Esquire, in a publication from 1910, and he is also mentioned in a 'New Orchids' publication in 1898.
That gives us a time frame of 50-60 years. It would be interesting if some of our UK members might be able to provide more information.
|
07-24-2014, 02:26 PM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2013
Zone: 7a
Location: North Plainfield, NJ
Posts: 2,817
|
|
And, not all clones are as good as these.
Some years ago I came across another Harrisianum at the Slipper Orchid Forum in DC. My guess is that this plant was bred with villosum as the pod parent, as it strongly resembles the villosum shape. Here it is for reference.
|
Post Thanks / Like - 2 Likes
|
|
|
07-24-2014, 03:39 PM
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 7,196
|
|
I really like the first one. The glossy texture, nice barbartum shape with interesting patterns on the dorsal.
The last one would have been so nice if the dorsal would have been better. Overall nice dark villosum look.
I was just reading about this cross the other day. how funny!
By the way, does pod parent really dictate the flower shape? I guess it differ by each cross?
I read about how the pod parents "might" affect the overall plant size, which is not always the case.
|
07-24-2014, 09:00 PM
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: May 2008
Zone: 9a
Location: Nor Cal
Posts: 26,634
|
|
Nice!
|
07-24-2014, 09:42 PM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2013
Zone: 7a
Location: North Plainfield, NJ
Posts: 2,817
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by NYCorchidman
I really like the first one. The glossy texture, nice barbartum shape with interesting patterns on the dorsal.
The last one would have been so nice if the dorsal would have been better. Overall nice dark villosum look.
I was just reading about this cross the other day. how funny!
By the way, does pod parent really dictate the flower shape? I guess it differ by each cross?
I read about how the pod parents "might" affect the overall plant size, which is not always the case.
|
When dealing with primary hybrids, the pod parent tends to dominate in one or more areas (size, shape, color, etc.). For example, in Paph Nitens (= insigne x villosum) the insigne always dominates for color, but the pod parent dominates for shape.
Likewise, I have 4 Neostylis Pinky (= Neofinetia falcata x Rhynchostylis gigantea). In terms of size, it is very obvious which one was the pod parent in each case.
|
01-25-2021, 04:37 PM
|
Jr. Member
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 21
|
|
Does anyone know when GS Ball clone was named? I can't find an award for that clone either. Thank you
|
01-25-2021, 08:17 PM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2013
Zone: 7a
Location: North Plainfield, NJ
Posts: 2,817
|
|
'GS Ball variety' is a synonym for 'Superbum'.
It is mentioned in the UK shortly after WWI, when it was awarded an FCC by the RHS.
The AOS shows that an HCC/AOS was awarded in 1980 to: Paph Harrisianum 'FCC/RHS'. The photo seems to be the same as 'Superbum'.
__________________
Kim (Fair Orchids)
Founder of SPCOP (Society to Prevention of Cruelty to Orchid People), with the goal of barring the taxonomists from tinkering with established genera!
I am neither a 'lumper' nor a 'splitter', but I refuse to re-write millions of labels.
|
01-26-2021, 08:10 AM
|
Jr. Member
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 21
|
|
Thanks you
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:31 AM.
|