and become Forum Supporter. Many perks! <...more...> |
there is about 100% chance that your plant already has bacillus subtilis and saccaromyces cerivisiae coating the roots and leaves and about a 0% chance that it contains the engineered strains that are in the solution. the qualities of the strains in the solution ARE the technology/secret sauce not the strains themselves. the mechanisms that inocucor work on which helps your plants: 1. enzymes which can break down biofilms and increase nutrient and waste cycling in the rhizosphere 2. production of antibiotic substances from the microbial components 3. out competition on/in the rhizosphere undesirables via mechanisms 1 and 2 4. production of plant growth promoting and regulating substances via the from the fermentate as well as upon inoculation from the microbes themselves. so no, it would be unlikely for one to be able to recreate the product that a biotechnology company spent years of R&D on and is employing successfully at commercial scales. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
So, what bacteria do they list in the remaining 0% that they don't guarantee? I'm always leery of secret, but critical, ingredients; reminds me of SUPERthrive. And yes, I get it: secret ingredients, Coca Cola and KFC. If the remaining 0% is a critical (active) part of the bacterial consortia, provides specialized protection and make it a broad spectrum product, shouldn't they list them? Ray, can you share the list? |
#8
|
||||
|
||||
OW - My understanding is that the other species are indeed active, but our opinions (and I agree with you) that they should, therefore, be on the label, are apparently irrelevant. However, looking at it from a business standpoint, if the added burden of listing them - testing at the very least - can be avoided, and your sales are exploding anyway, why would you do it?
Labeling requirements can have some serious "gotchas" in them, requiring companies to decide what and how they're going to say stuff on them. I'll use seaweed products as an example. State that the contents are seaweed extract and they are considered to be "plant and soil amendments". State the contents of hormones those extracts contain, and it becomes a "plant growth regulator", with far more stringent and expensive registration and testing requirements. Inocucor Garden Solution is sold as a "plant probiotic", making it also a plant and soil amendment. If they sold it to cure diseases (which it can), it becomes a pesticide with all of the registration and testing burden. As far as listing those other ingredients, I don't feel it's my place to do that. Sorry. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Sorry, not a business model I care for.
|
#10
|
||||
|
||||
C'mon OW. You're just being a curmudgeon now, a term I usually reserve for myself (as does my wife...)
I think it's a model of practicality. If this was your business, would you prefer to spend about $10,000 to have your product registered in every state, or that plus the cost of EPA registration of your company and manufacturing facility, as well as the testing needed and cost of EPA registration of the product - probably approaching $1-million or so? The product works either way, and you would have to charge one hell of a lot more if the latter route was taken. |
Bookmarks |
Tags |
fungus, pot, remove, sufficient, white |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Neofinetia Flower Color Index | gmdiaz | Vanda Alliance - Neofinetia | 12 | 12-28-2016 07:17 PM |
leaf drop on phal with white fuzz on roots | allyqat | Beginner Discussion | 14 | 05-29-2013 02:31 PM |
Great White Premium Mycorrhizae | RJSquirrel | Scientific Matters | 9 | 03-25-2013 11:36 AM |
White fungus in my s/h | Autumn Child | Semi-Hydroponic Culture | 8 | 05-18-2010 06:35 AM |
White Substance Layer on New Vanda Root | knot | Beginner Discussion | 4 | 04-23-2010 03:24 AM |