Macro lens for small orchid flowers (Nikon D7100)

[K-Sci]

Originally Posted by ArronOB

I don’t think macro photographers worry about depth of field much these days - at least not with stationary subjects.

Just use stacking software to get any dof you want.

Do you have a recommendation?
-Keith

---------- Post added at 08:46 AM ---------- Previous post was at 08:34 AM ----------

Originally Posted by camille1585

I use the Tamron SP 90mm F/2.8 Di MACRO 1:1 USD.

I was hoping you'd respond to the thread.


So from your experience and photos at 90mm, I think I can conclude that the 105mm I've been looking at is sufficient focal length. I'm not photographing insects.
I switched from Canon to Nikon about 10 years ago, and have been unhappy about it ever since. Not because of the camera quality or features, but the need to start learning all over again.

I've read some reviews for the Tamron lenses in the 90mm lens. You're not the only one who like them.

The 105mm Nikon I've been looking at has image stabilization.

If you use a tripod and a small aperture (f/16-20), you can get some really decent DOF on small orchid flowers. I'm old school and like to do things in camera as much as possible, and have never tried focus stacking. Here are some samples of images with the Tamron:
Podangis dactylorceras. IOSPE gives flower size as 1/8" x 1/2" [2mm x 7 mm]
Howeara Lava Burst
Phal Liodoro

Thanks for the recommendation and demonstration photos. Very nice and very helpful.

-Keith

---------- Post added at 08:48 AM ---------- Previous post was at 08:46 AM ----------

Originally Posted by Ray

I agree with Aaron - no macro lens will provide a lot of depth of field.

I’ve never done any stacking…

Hi Ray. Same question as Aaron. What SW do you like?
Post-processing can be a lot of work.

-Keith

[camille1585]

Originally Posted by K-Sci

The 105mm Nikon I've been looking at has image stabilization.Thanks for the recommendation and demonstration photos. Very nice and very helpful.

The 100mm range is extremely versatile when it comes to macros and close ups, and you'll get far more use out of this focal length than getting something longer/shorter.

[K-Sci]

Originally Posted by camille1585

The 100mm range is extremely versatile when it comes to macros and close ups, and you'll get far more use out of this focal length than getting something longer/shorter.

I have an 18-105mm F3.5-5.6 zoom that came with my camera body. It's been a very nice for just about everything I want to do, except it's terrible for close-ups. After just a bit more reasearch I think I'm going to take your advice.

You mentioned prices being high on lenses. The unforeseen consequences of government mandated businesses closings in the covid scare have precipitated widespread shortages in electrical components. I get a call every week or so from one of our PCB assemblers because they can't get one or another parts needed to build the board.I'm sure the electronics in cameras are having the the same problem and it is still getting worse. People who want to buy something with electronic components in it, best do it now.

-Keith