Larry's Orchids on eBay
Login
User Name
Password   


Registration is FREE. Click to become a member of OrchidBoard community
(You're NOT logged in)

menu menu

Sponsor
Donate Now
and become
Forum Supporter.

Larry's Orchids on eBay
Many perks!
<...more...>


Sponsor
 

Google


Fauna Top Sites
Register Larry's Orchids on eBay Members Larry's Orchids on eBay Larry's Orchids on eBay Today's PostsLarry's Orchids on eBay Larry's Orchids on eBay Larry's Orchids on eBay
LOG IN/REGISTER TO CLOSE THIS ADVERTISEMENT
Go Back   Orchid Board - Most Complete Orchid Forum on the web ! > >
Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 10-26-2006, 04:49 PM
dot dot is offline
Jr. Member
 

Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Michigan
Posts: 13
Default Larry's Orchids on eBay

One of my slipper friends alerted me the other day that one of my photos was posted on an eBay site:
http://cgi.ebay.com/Phragmipedium-Wo...QcmdZViewItem?
When I saw it, I knew that someone from that company had taken it from the Porter's Orchids site, where I am the Webmaster and do nearly all the photography. I emailed Larry's Orchids, telling them that although I had given permission for that photo to be displayed on certain sites (e.g., slipperorchids.info), theirs was not one of them. I asked them to either take off the photo or pay me for it's commercial use.
They wrote back saying that the photo would be taken off within 24 hours. Their webmaster wrote back at the same time saying it would be taken off within the hour.
After 24 hours, and the photo was still up, I wrote to them again, stating that I was not pleased. I also mentioned that I'm now on our orchid society's Board of Directors, and that maybe the Board would like to know this about one of their proposed vendors for our February show. I also mentioned that people on the slipper forums have expressed displeasure with such antics on other eBay sites.
Larry wrote back and accused me of blackmail, and said he wanted to be placed on the Board's agenda. I gave him the names and emails of all the board members and when our next meeting would be. I also told him that he could call it blackmail if he liked, but wondered what he would call taking a photo from another's website and using it as his own? I would call it theft.
It has now been 53 hours since I was told the photo would be taken down within 24 hours, and it is still there. In fact, it appears 3 times on that page.
I also want everyone to be aware that he changed the name of the file, and put his own watermark on the lower right corner -- as if it were his own photo.
I contacted eBay support and told them of this infraction. Just got a letter back from them saying, basically, if I want to do anything about it, I have to download a form, fill it out and fax it to them. They noted that time was very important as items come and go quickly on eBay. In other words, although I gave them all the particulars in my email to them, they really don't want to do anything about it.
Yes, I've asked to place this issue on our Board's agenda.
Incidentally, until this happened, I had high regard for Larry and his business. I've purchased at least one plant and some supplies from them, and supported their inclusion on our vendor list.
Just thought you'd all like to know about all this.
__________________
Dot
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 10-26-2006, 10:19 PM
justatypn's Avatar
justatypn justatypn is offline
Senior Member
 

Join Date: Jun 2006
Zone: 9b
Location: Central Florida
Posts: 3,069
Default

Dot...It never ceases to amaze me the testicular fortitude of some who wrongfully take advantage of others. Hopefully the situation will resolve itself and the rightful party shows face to the board. You have a great slippery friend knowing and spotting your work. Good Luck...
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 10-27-2006, 03:02 AM
Magnus A Magnus A is offline
Senior Member
 

Join Date: Oct 2006
Zone: 7a
Location: Uppsala, Sweden
Age: 51
Posts: 638
Default

Hi Dot. Things like this makes me so mad. A vendor should be able to pay for the right to use a picture, or at least ask to be allowed to use it.
If possible, could you continue to report what is happening? I think if the word is spread maybe it can hit back on Larry´s.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 10-27-2006, 01:37 PM
Ross Ross is offline
Senior Member
 

Join Date: Sep 2006
Zone: 5a
Posts: 9,277
Default

As a professional photographer myself, I share with your feelings. The only recourse right now is to "grab" a screenshot of the posting and seek recourse in small claims court UNLESS you had the forethought to register said image with US Government. You can download the appropriate form and make a mass submission of ALL your images as one submission and then you are able to seek big $$$ damages. Simple notice of copyright allows a much smaller award. In either case, this vendor will lose - but is it worth the trouble to you? I think spreading this message and avoiding this vendor is the best way to handle this. For the future, though, I would suggest registering all the images on your web site and then you will be protected for the future. (JMHO)
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 10-29-2006, 11:22 AM
dot dot is offline
Jr. Member
 

Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Michigan
Posts: 13
Default

Thanks for the replies.
I'm told by the webmaster that the photo has to stay on the specific bid page for 90 days, but that no one can access it unless they've bookmarked it. The photo has been removed from the other places on their site.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 09-25-2007, 03:10 PM
littlefrog's Avatar
littlefrog littlefrog is offline
Senior Member
American Orchid Society Judge
 

Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Mid Michigan
Posts: 944
Default Larry's Orchids

OK, this absolutely ridiculous and bordering on fraud.

Lc. Mini Purple v. coerulea 'Sato' Blue Orchid Plant - (eBay item 170151138044 end time Sep-26-07 19:03:17 PDT)

Does anybody else have a problem with marketing a plant like this? There is no way that photo is accurate. It is photoshopped beyond belief.

Last edited by littlefrog; 09-25-2007 at 04:37 PM.. Reason: update photo
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 09-25-2007, 03:38 PM
Lagoon Lagoon is offline
Senior Member
 

Join Date: Apr 2006
Zone: 5a
Location: Quebec, Canada
Age: 59
Posts: 5,406
Default

You really have to wonder what people are thinking sometimes.
I found another picture off the same site, same vendor ...

Lc. Mini Purple v. coerulea 'Sato' Blue Orchid Plant - (eBay item 170144535509 end time Sep-28-07 10:14:56 PDT)

Both photos are on this page - One on the top left another right side further down.

eBay Store - Larrys Orchids and Tropicals: Cattleya Alliance: Lc. White Spark 'Panda' Hybrid Orchid Plant
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 09-25-2007, 03:47 PM
Dorothy Dorothy is offline
Senior Member
 

Join Date: Apr 2007
Zone: 7b
Location: Long Island, NY
Age: 63
Posts: 7,321
Default

It looks as thought the photo has gone through some kind of colored lens effect . I am surprised because I have bought from Larry's and am very happy with their masdies. The pictures of those items were not misleading.
Did you email Larry's and bring this to his attention?
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 09-25-2007, 03:53 PM
littlefrog's Avatar
littlefrog littlefrog is offline
Senior Member
American Orchid Society Judge
 

Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Mid Michigan
Posts: 944
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dorothy View Post
It looks as thought the photo has gone through some kind of colored lens effect . I am surprised because I have bought from Larry's and am very happy with their masdies. The pictures of those items were not misleading.
Did you email Larry's and bring this to his attention?
Feel free. I don't think he actually knows what the plant is supposed to look like in flower, it is probably a picture he found somewhere.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 09-25-2007, 04:27 PM
Dorothy Dorothy is offline
Senior Member
 

Join Date: Apr 2007
Zone: 7b
Location: Long Island, NY
Age: 63
Posts: 7,321
Default

I had seen that happen on eBay before. There was one orchid auctioned by another seller that was a totally different plant - I did bring it to their attention, they were grateful and they changed their photo.
But I agree, they may not know what they look like and just found a photo somewhere .. I don't mind if a seller just posts a photo of the orchid plant that they are selling instead of an assumed bloom - if I have an interest, I google to see what it looks like.

Last edited by Dorothy; 09-25-2007 at 05:49 PM.. Reason: Removed photo - it was not a coerulea
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Tags
board, ebay, hours, photo, wrote, orchids, larrys


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
What got you hooked growing orchids? Oscarman Beginner Discussion 137 08-22-2022 12:08 PM
Orchids and 'sexual deception' Tindomul Scientific Matters 21 08-21-2016 12:38 AM
OOOHHH Glow in the Dark Orchids! Tindomul Scientific Matters 60 03-28-2010 10:09 PM
Endangered African Orchids because they are FOOD!! Tindomul Scientific Matters 18 03-05-2008 10:55 AM

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:06 PM.

© 2007 OrchidBoard.com
Search Engine Optimisation provided by DragonByte SEO v2.0.37 (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2024 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Feedback Buttons provided by Advanced Post Thanks / Like (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2024 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.

Clubs vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.