the thing we learn here in school is... if it's from wikipedia.... don't expect it to be true. And that is quite a strange form and colour for a coerulea if i might say.
But u are completely right... the color of the flowers is very variable and will be different in each picture according to lightning/camera/etc...
And i also know there are varieties like lord supra's and the wild form... but all of them have reflexed petals (2 of them) in some degree... also they have very distinct hooks on their lips, your orchid also shows that, but in a lesser degree, and that's what makes me think that it might be a hybrid, along with the slightly longer leaves and speckles... but u are right, it's my opinion and to really settle this we would have to find an orchid expert.... but lets not go there shall we XD.
I was only saying that wonderlen had an excellent point in telling that and meant no harm by doing it, neither did I. But for what i have seen so far.... there have been countless and countless more wrong naming of the vanda coerulea.... and most of them just named it like that because it had tessellation and was very blue.
one thing u could check to see if its a close hybrid or the true plant itself, they should have been able to flower at really young age, so u should see leftovers of flowerstalks to a very low point on the plant. In comparison with other vandas and hybrids who tend to need 6 or even 7 years to mature and flower...
anyways, great growing and I am going to stop giving u my opinion right here
ps: the variety i like the most is the slender wild form with beautiful flowers, and not the breeded rounder and bigger forms... too bad that I will probably never find it.
greets,
Dries