Swim made a good point. Actual watts are important; "equivalent" watts is a useless parameter for plants.
Unlike him though, I wish all lamps had published PPF data, as that's what's truly important, as it represents a
quantity of light, as well as a true spectrum. Those two, combined, tell almost the entire story.
BBQ: Don't get sucked in by color temperature, as it's relatively meaningless in fluorescents and white LEDs, being a "corrected" or "correlated" color temperature - one that
looks like that black body temperature
to the human eye. Also, if you look at true published spectra for white LEDs, the "warmer" CCT's seem to have more far red in them, which is good for promoting flowering.
Here is a great graph showing the relationship between the plants' relative light absorption of the spectrum, and how PAR and the human eye response (lumens) differ from that.