Donate Now
and become
Forum Supporter.
Many perks! <...more...>
|
03-27-2010, 11:08 PM
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2007
Zone: 9a
Location: Brooksville, Florida
Age: 62
Posts: 1,741
|
|
Phal amabilis
So...everyone that know me, knows that I kill 90% of all phals.This one however, has managed to survive and even thrive. Quite the rarity in my orchid room
|
03-27-2010, 11:23 PM
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: chico, ca
Posts: 706
|
|
Lovely bloom!
Maureen
|
03-27-2010, 11:49 PM
|
Member
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2010
Age: 37
Posts: 60
|
|
good job...Lauran^^ hope can see more of your flower's picture ya^^
|
03-28-2010, 01:16 AM
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2009
Zone: 6a
Location: Mountain Home, Idaho
Age: 58
Posts: 3,387
|
|
I love is species. Great job!
|
03-29-2010, 01:28 PM
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: May 2008
Zone: 7b
Location: Smyrna, Georgia
Age: 68
Posts: 3,014
|
|
A lovely amabilis, too!
|
03-29-2010, 03:41 PM
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2008
Zone: 8a
Location: Piney Woods of East Texas
Age: 47
Posts: 3,253
|
|
I love it Laura! It looks more like aphrodite to me though. Probably 80% of the plants coming from Taiwan labeled as amabilis are actually aphrodite.
The main differences are the callus and the side lobes. The "toothed" appearance of the callus and the tubular effect of the side lobes are characteristics of aphrodite. True amabilis rarely have this nice closed, round form that your plant shows. I actually prefer aphrodite.
|
03-29-2010, 04:25 PM
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2007
Zone: 9a
Location: Brooksville, Florida
Age: 62
Posts: 1,741
|
|
Thanks for the great info Royal. I'll have to give it a closer look.
The plant is one that H&R had in their display at Redlands last year.
|
03-29-2010, 05:34 PM
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2008
Zone: 8a
Location: Piney Woods of East Texas
Age: 47
Posts: 3,253
|
|
It's a killer flower, looks like the spike is branching too - gotta love that! Yes, some have even been awarded as an amabilis, and hybrids have been registered incorrectly. I always thought that judges or the RHS would catch this type of mistake, but most just trust the tag, I guess.
Questioning the identity of a plant can really make some people angry. Thanks for taking my comments as they were intended - as a discussion amongst friends. I'm NOT an expert so I cant be positive, but I've had this same discussion with other very experienced growers whose opinions I trust. Once the differences are pointed out, it's relatively easy to distinguish between the two.
|
03-29-2010, 07:04 PM
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2007
Zone: 9a
Location: Brooksville, Florida
Age: 62
Posts: 1,741
|
|
Now if I could just find someone that could identify my Liparis that is labeled condylobulbon(which it's not)I'd be so much happier!
I am always willing to learn more about my orchids. I'll try and find the photo of last years blooms as I seem to remember they were larger and slightly different looking...
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:42 AM.
|