I thought something was a bit off when they don't list their ingredients on the bottles.
One of the red flags for me with Superthrive was all the advertising on the package. It literally looks like a bottle on card with a bunch of writing on it that makes it look like something out of an infomercial (if this makes any sense).
The point being...
Why so much advertising?
I'll admit, I bought Superthive before, and I bought a bottle of K-L-N not too long ago.
At least Superthrive has some NAA in it.
Not sure what the vitamin B1 does for the plant. I gotta look that up.
I don't know...
I seriously think that someone needs to conduct a controlled experiment with these two products and see what's up.
__________________
Philip
Last edited by King_of_orchid_growing:); 04-30-2010 at 04:21 AM..
[QUOTE=King_of_orchid_growingOne of the red flags for me with Superthrive was all the advertising on the package. It literally looks like a bottle on card with a bunch of writing on it that makes it look like something out of an infomercial (if this makes any sense).
[/QUOTE]
Yeah, it kind of reminds me of the adds for X-ray glasses they used to hustle in the back of comic books
hmmm pretty much the same if you ignore the fertilizer in K L N and the fact that the superthrive seems to have more of the b1 and naa so if you add superthrive to your fertlizer mix it should be just as good as K L N but with less heavy metals it would seem to me....
but yes the superthrive packaging is hype and LOL he did very well with it and sold a lot ....but thats is marketing and according to this post a higher strenght of active ingredients than K L N so I dont really see a red flag other than the 50 other ingredients that are not listed.
If K L N is proven effective superthive added to fertilizer would have to be just as effective if not just a touch more unless a higher proportion of active ingredients negates its action ....