Quote:
Originally Posted by hypostatic
(Post 948911)
Also, it seems osmocote is heat activated, and Nutircote is more time released? So in the icy north of NJ, maybe Nutircote is a better option?
|
All "controlled release" fertilizers are controlled by temperature. The fertilizer powders are encapsulated in a porous polymer coating that has a known thermal expansion. As the coating gets warmer and expands, the pore size enlarges, allowing more water in and fertilizer solution to escape.
Manufacturers use different polymers based upon the intended application. For example, the stuff I use on my shrubs, annuals and herbs here in southeastern NC has the following profile:
https://firstrays.com/wp-content/upl...ife-300x50.jpg
When I was in PA, where the ground is cooler, I used one that had a 5-6 month expected life span at 70°.
Also keep in mind that the published "longevity" numbers are assumed to be at a constant moisture content.
People who see Osmocote as "dumping" too much nutrition are probably just using the wrong one, but if they water more often - due to hot weather, or whatever - that also accelerates the extraction (dumping) rate.
Quote:
Ray, what formulation would you recommend for carasetums, which are very high-demand for nutrients? This past season I was using a ridiculous amount of the K-lite fertilizer....
|
I don't grow them, so cannot recommend, but generally, I think K-Lite's formula is appropriate for most orchids.
Remember that it is the
mass of applied nutrients that is important, so whether you use a mix-and-apply formula, or a slow release one, the amount (of nitrogen, particularly) applied should be the same.
I don't know what you consider to be "a ridiculous amount", but if you water well, flooding the pot, doing so with a fertilizer solution and with plain water on pots containing slow-release fertilizers, the losses to drainage should be similar.