I’m always a bit conflicted about the water holding properties of media.
As I grow in a concrete floored shadehouse, if My plants need more water I just set the watering system to run more often. Why would someone in that position want the bark to retain water? It seems to me that water flowing through frequently is a lot better then water that hangs around in the pot for a few days. Lots of flushing and less chance for moisture-loving pathogens to flourish.
I guess we are fortunate that our water is good, and it’s cheap, and watering is not a big chore. I realise growing inside may be different.
In my situation I think the unmodified bark would be best, there being no need to develop a water-holding outer layer which seems to be a focus of brands like Orchiata. So it’s just a matter of dealing with pathogens and (possibly but unlikely) with resin. The talk about removing unspecified ‘toxins’ I’m happy to class as just marketing nonsense.
Am I missing something in my thinking ?
Last edited by ArronOB; 05-02-2018 at 06:12 PM..
|