Donate Now
and become
Forum Supporter.
Many perks! <...more...>
|
10-27-2016, 11:55 AM
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 553
|
|
Re calculation, see wikipedia entry for depth of field and scroll down to "DOF formulae". I used 0.3 mm for circle of confusion, others use pixel size of sensor.
You can also use the table I provided in the following article:
Geiger, D. L. 2013. Imaging small orchid flowers using visible light. Orchid Digest 77: 112–123.
It can download it under
Current Projects
No surprise that PS elements or PS full does not cut if for 20+ frames. The issue with using focus changes is that the magnification of the image also changes, particularly in close-ups/macro. That introduces alignment errors and also distortion into the image. That is why I usually move the entire camera rig. At >1:1 you run into further problems when twisting the focus ring, because the lens barrel extends, so changes distance between nodal point of lens and desired focal plane. Then you have to move camera set-up (or plant).
Motorized focusing rail is certainly the most convenient. Set-up, press one button, come back a couple minutes later with 100 shots in the camera. It can also be done with a manual focusing rail, not as convenient, but it works, up to about 2:1. At higher mag, the step-size is so small, that it is virtually impossible to do it manually.
Macro
Hejnar makes some cool focusing rails with micrometer adjustments. I don't have one of those, but that might be an option.
|
10-27-2016, 12:13 PM
|
|
Moderator
|
|
Join Date: May 2005
Zone: 7b
Location: Queens, NY, & Madison County NC, US
Age: 44
Posts: 19,374
|
|
That almost has me sold. Checking my bank account now.
__________________
"We must not look at goblin men,
We must not buy their fruits:
Who knows upon what soil they fed
Their hungry thirsty roots?"
Goblin Market
by Christina Georgina Rossetti
|
07-08-2017, 12:24 AM
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2017
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 249
|
|
Pretty OK results for someone that's obviously a newbie!!
Someone's been reading articles on wikipedia.
Am I right?
Seriously, Nice work. I've seen some pretty amazing macro work on some photography forums, but nothing quite like this. I haven't tried focus stacking before. Very impressive results. I have done something completely different which is exposure stacking for astrophotography, but only in the most rudimentary way.
|
07-08-2017, 12:00 PM
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 553
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by nogreenthumbs
Pretty OK results for someone that's obviously a newbie!!
Someone's been reading articles on wikipedia.
Am I right?
Seriously, Nice work. I've seen some pretty amazing macro work on some photography forums, but nothing quite like this. I haven't tried focus stacking before. Very impressive results. I have done something completely different which is exposure stacking for astrophotography, but only in the most rudimentary way.
|
Thanks for the flowers! exposure stacking for noise reduction, I presume, not HDR. I haven't used that much, AffinityPhoto has some nice features in that regard. AffinityPhoto also has a pretty decent stacking option, though Heliconfocus and ZereneStacker are still better. Mark Levoy has some really good digital imaging lectures; see
Digital Photography
|
07-08-2017, 01:03 PM
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2017
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 249
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by tropterrarium
Thanks for the flowers! exposure stacking for noise reduction, I presume, not HDR. I haven't used that much, AffinityPhoto has some nice features in that regard. AffinityPhoto also has a pretty decent stacking option, though Heliconfocus and ZereneStacker are still better. Mark Levoy has some really good digital imaging lectures; see
Digital Photography
|
Noise reduction is goal #2. Goal #1 is increased exposure. You don't collect much light in AP, so by stacking multiple exposures, you get additional exposure on distant stars and dim galaxies or nubula etc... It increases the SNR.
Again, really amazing photos!
|
Tags
|
image, dxo, files, stacking, images, pixels, 5dsr, bit, file, f/2.8, 5d2, processing, information, macpro, print, canon, f/4, larger, crop, resolution, short, previous, steps, directory, field |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:51 AM.
|