Phyton 27  -vs-  Phyton 35
Login
User Name
Password   


Registration is FREE. Click to become a member of OrchidBoard community
(You're NOT logged in)

menu menu

Sponsor
Donate Now
and become
Forum Supporter.

Phyton 27  -vs-  Phyton 35
Many perks!
<...more...>


Sponsor
 

Google


Fauna Top Sites
Register Phyton 27  -vs-  Phyton 35 Members Phyton 27  -vs-  Phyton 35 Phyton 27  -vs-  Phyton 35 Today's PostsPhyton 27  -vs-  Phyton 35 Phyton 27  -vs-  Phyton 35 Phyton 27  -vs-  Phyton 35
LOG IN/REGISTER TO CLOSE THIS ADVERTISEMENT
Go Back   Orchid Board - Most Complete Orchid Forum on the web ! > >
Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 07-11-2013, 12:08 PM
HighSeas HighSeas is offline
Senior Member
 

Join Date: Apr 2010
Zone: 9b
Location: Port Richey, Florida
Age: 67
Posts: 565
Default Phyton 27 -vs- Phyton 35

I was recently online shopping for the best price I could find on Phyton 27 when I ran across several vendors who had Phyton 35 and called it the new "substitute" for 27.

Both are bactericides. Both fungicides. Both systemic.

I live in a highly humid environment....where it is APPARENTLY NEVER going to quit raining. I'd like to have on hand something systemic. That said....

What is the difference between the two? If it's the "substitute" then I would assume that something has changed. (Sometimes for the better...sometimes not)

Does anyone know?

Also...does anyone have a good lead on better prices?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 07-11-2013, 02:47 PM
Jayfar Jayfar is offline
Senior Member
 

Join Date: May 2010
Zone: 7b
Member of:AOS, FSoA
Location: Philadelphia, PA, USA
Posts: 1,032
Default

First I'd heard of it, but yes there it is on the manufacturer's website with an FAQ comparing the two.

FAQ | Phyton 35

and another FAQ on Phyton 27:
FAQ | Phyton 27
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 07-12-2013, 07:52 AM
Ray's Avatar
Ray Ray is offline
Senior Member
 

Join Date: May 2005
Member of:AOS
Location: Oak Island NC
Posts: 15,065
Phyton 27  -vs-  Phyton 35 Male
Default

Phyton 35 is Phyton 27 with the 1.25% picric acid removed. It is removed so the product can be used on food crops, as the picric acid is toxic to people by all entry modes.

Handled properly, and diluted appropriately, there is not enough in the product to be concerned about, so I would think they could be used interchangeably.

Personally, I avoid copper sulfate-bearing fungicides, as it can be out-and-out toxic to some less-hardy orchids. I treat topically with Physan or Zero-Tol/Oxidate (same chemical), and if I HAVE to have a systemic, I go with Cleary's 3336WP.
__________________
Ray Barkalow, Orchid Iconoclast
FIRSTRAYS.COM
Try Kelpak - you won't be sorry!
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 07-12-2013, 11:33 AM
HighSeas HighSeas is offline
Senior Member
 

Join Date: Apr 2010
Zone: 9b
Location: Port Richey, Florida
Age: 67
Posts: 565
Default

Thank you! That's interesting. I have wondered about the Copper based products and have read that there are particular orchids that do not respond well to them.

Ray...would you mind sharing with me the criteria you would use for HAVING to have a systemic? Thank you for letting me pick your brain!
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 07-12-2013, 01:38 PM
Ray's Avatar
Ray Ray is offline
Senior Member
 

Join Date: May 2005
Member of:AOS
Location: Oak Island NC
Posts: 15,065
Phyton 27  -vs-  Phyton 35 Male
Default

If the plant has internal fungal infections, a systemic is necessary - unless you were already planning to throw the plants away.

Topicals will knock back the population in the local environment, and may totally cure surface molds and mildews, but once the infection has gone systemic - so much so that cutting off the infected area would be detrimental to the life of the plant - it's the big guns or bye-bye.
__________________
Ray Barkalow, Orchid Iconoclast
FIRSTRAYS.COM
Try Kelpak - you won't be sorry!
Reply With Quote
Post Thanks / Like - 1 Likes
Likes HighSeas liked this post
  #6  
Old 07-12-2013, 02:35 PM
NYCorchidman NYCorchidman is offline
Senior Member
 

Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 7,196
Phyton 27  -vs-  Phyton 35
Default

I read that copper based chemicals are not supposed to be used on dendrobiums.
How about paphiopedilums? anyone knows?
Some of my paphiopedilums are now showing up some strange symptoms and I would like to use systemic.

Does phyton 27 or 35 have copper in them?
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 07-13-2013, 12:34 AM
HighSeas HighSeas is offline
Senior Member
 

Join Date: Apr 2010
Zone: 9b
Location: Port Richey, Florida
Age: 67
Posts: 565
Default

Yes...they do have Copper Sulfate. And you're right, you can't use them on Dendrobiums.

Good question though....I'm interested in that answer myself! Can you use these on Paphs?
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Tags
difference, hand, phyton, substitute, systemic, vs-


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Use of Physan 20 and Phyton 27 Cewal Beginner Discussion 13 09-30-2010 07:35 PM
Physan, Phyton or Thiomyl?? orchidjunky Beginner Discussion 12 12-03-2009 08:28 PM
Phyton 27 in Canada/good mailorder supplier? calvin_orchidL Pests & Diseases 2 09-16-2008 01:21 PM

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:56 AM.

© 2007 OrchidBoard.com
Search Engine Optimisation provided by DragonByte SEO v2.0.37 (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2024 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Feedback Buttons provided by Advanced Post Thanks / Like (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2024 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.

Clubs vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.