Donate Now
and become
Forum Supporter.
Many perks! <...more...>
|
03-07-2010, 06:26 PM
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Aurora, Illinois
Posts: 1,016
|
|
You make the call.
This is P. Black Cherry X sukhakulii. Very hard to photograph, so I did it two ways, next I'll try it with the outside as the b/g. see what you think.... Jim.
|
03-07-2010, 06:53 PM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2008
Zone: 9a
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 9,313
|
|
I think the second picture has better contrast, but the extremely light background is distracting.
The first thing my eyes land on is the blueish-white background.
Last edited by King_of_orchid_growing:); 03-07-2010 at 06:55 PM..
|
03-07-2010, 07:27 PM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2008
Zone: 6b
Location: The beautiful Hudson Valley of NY
Posts: 1,870
|
|
I like the first better, but the dorsal looks different in each. It might look real good if you you do it outside with a nice blue sky as the backround.
Then again, what I know about photography, wouldn't fill a thimble.
Bill
|
03-07-2010, 07:53 PM
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2008
Zone: 5b
Location: W. Bloomfield, Michigan
Posts: 3,086
|
|
I think, well that's the first mistake... me thinking... anyway, Jim, dark against light works because the dark flower color gets lost against the black background. Maybe go softer on the lighting to reduce the glare... maybe just a fill light or wait for a cloudy day or ????? The waxy surfaces are making it difficult, I guess... maybe use a polarizing filter. That might reduce the glare and intensify the color.
|
03-07-2010, 08:20 PM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2008
Zone: 9a
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 9,313
|
|
The lighting isn't a problem for me in the second photo. I like it actually. The reflection off the waxy surface of the petals and the lip gives it a sense of the thick waxy texture with the subtle veination and raised bumps. Idk, that's something I'd like to know about if I were looking at an orchid flower.
However, I think the background is too light. Perhaps a sky blue bg would work better.
|
03-07-2010, 08:53 PM
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2009
Zone: 5a
Location: MA, USA and Atenas Costa Rica
Posts: 1,508
|
|
Photography is one of my areas of expertise. I think the light needs to be more diffuse, perhaps by draping a kleenex over the flash unit, or better yet using an offset flash or reflector. What kind of camera are you using?
A polarizing filter would only be useful outdoors in sun around mid-day, when the ambient light is polarized. With a flash it's just a neutral density filter. In any case, your camera would have to accommodate filters.
I agree that a more neutral background would be better. You could try for a foliage background in soft focus.
If I have to choose, I prefer the one against a white background.
|
03-08-2010, 01:09 PM
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Aurora, Illinois
Posts: 1,016
|
|
Thanks for all the nice comments guys, I know alot about what your saying about lighting, I was a cinematographer for almost 50 years now retired and all I use is a Canon p&s digital all auto camera. So here are some pics of how the b/g can change the pic, also a shot of my setup. Thanks.... Jim.
Last edited by jim blanford; 03-08-2010 at 02:30 PM..
|
03-08-2010, 11:12 PM
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2009
Zone: 5a
Location: MA, USA and Atenas Costa Rica
Posts: 1,508
|
|
Wow, that is quite a set-up- I like the second one the best. Beautiful flower, by the way.
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:34 AM.
|