It would vary from species to species, so really the question is overly broad.
It's also a topic for which there would be very little to no actual data -- meaning most of us would be relegated to guessing. Even if there's a way to accurately identify the age of 1 specific growth, it's not something that's being studied extensively enough (to the best of my knowledge) to have reliable information.
I think, at most, we might have a lower bound (i.e. for instance, if a specific plant has been in cultivation for 100 years, then we know that the species can live to be at least 100), but it's unlikely that there would be precise enough records to say that the same exact growth (sans pups, keikis) has lived that long except, perhaps, in a small number of very rare examples.
There are also aspects of scope and context that come into question. For instance, in theory, many orchids should be able to live for at least a century, but I suspect the practical answer is "they can live as long as they aren't killed by disease, pests, environmental change, natural disaster, loss of habitat, and things of that nature."
We know for sure that specific clones can live for 100+ years, but again, this does not account for the "specific growth" condition you've specified. There are also some species that people suspect have a lifespan of around a decade or two, at least in cultivation.
|