Donate Now
and become
Forum Supporter.
Many perks! <...more...>
|
08-16-2010, 09:48 PM
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2009
Zone: 6a
Location: Pennsylvania
Age: 29
Posts: 6,061
|
|
what is a mule ear oncidium?
what is a mule ear oncidium? is an alcra or onc. sharry baby considered mule ear?
|
08-16-2010, 11:21 PM
|
|
OB Admin
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2005
Zone: 3a
Location: Edmonton, Alberta. Canada
Posts: 2,895
|
|
They are oncidium species that have thick fleshy leaves. Typically I think that they are suited to high light growing environments.
Don't think that Alcra. or Onc. Sharry Baby are mule ears.
I would think that Onc. papillio and similar species are mule ears.
|
08-17-2010, 12:03 AM
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2009
Zone: 5a
Location: Madison WI
Age: 65
Posts: 2,509
|
|
"Mule ear' has probably been applied to almost any strap leaved Oncidium (like Sharry Baby), but as far as a common name can really have any specific meaning I think it was meant to apply only to the stiff almost succulent large upright leaf types with small pseudobulbs, like Oncidium (or Trichocentrum) luridum or lanceanum. Find a good picture of one of those plants and I think you will understand the concept.
|
08-17-2010, 12:32 AM
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2010
Zone: 5b
Location: Lakewood, CO
Age: 35
Posts: 2,289
|
|
My Oncidumnia Carnival Costume is what is considered a Mule Ear- it has stiff, somewhat fleshy leaves, and smaller pseudobulbs.
|
08-17-2010, 12:34 AM
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2010
Zone: 5b
Location: Lakewood, CO
Age: 35
Posts: 2,289
|
|
Oncidium Twinkle- strap leaf.
Thin, pliable and strappy- you can see through these. Not through the Mule Ears.
|
08-17-2010, 02:49 AM
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2007
Zone: 7b
Posts: 3,623
|
|
none of the plants shown above are mule ear oncidiums. MEO has very thick leave, almost succulent, and most of them are now in the genus Trichocentrum or in the genus Lophiaris. The name come from the resemblance of the leave with mule ears (easy,no? ) something like this:
By the way, Psichopsis are not considered MEO! their leave are not thick and large enough! MEO normally have many many small flowers (well, small is relative, but never as large as single Psichopsis flowers)
good examples of MEO are:
Onc. splendidum IOSPE PHOTOS <- This is a fantastic species! I highly recommend it!
Onc. lanceanum IOSPE PHOTOS
Onc. cavendishianum IOSPE PHOTOS
Onc. aurisasinorum IOSPE PHOTOS
Onc. carthagenense http://www.orchidspecies.com/oncidiumcarthagenense.htm
Last edited by kavanaru; 08-17-2010 at 04:55 AM..
|
08-17-2010, 11:24 AM
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2009
Zone: 6a
Location: Pennsylvania
Age: 29
Posts: 6,061
|
|
thanks guys! this helped alot. i was only wondering, so that i could get the right light for my sharry baby and alcra. pacific nova
|
08-18-2010, 02:35 PM
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2010
Zone: 5b
Location: Lakewood, CO
Age: 35
Posts: 2,289
|
|
Ramon- I'd be interested to hear why the Oncidumnia Carnival Costume is not considered a mule-ear. It seems to meet the criteria of the rest of the plants you posted.
eta: I did not post the Onc. twinkle as a mule ear, but as a strap leaf. Not sure if that was clear.
|
08-18-2010, 02:46 PM
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 6,386
|
|
Ramon is correct. Oncidumnia Carnival Costume is a hybrid of a Tolumnia which is not a mule ear, but an equitant (completely different leaf) and a a thin-leaved Oncidium which has larger bulbs proportionally and much finer leaves than a mule-ear.
|
08-18-2010, 02:51 PM
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2010
Zone: 5b
Location: Lakewood, CO
Age: 35
Posts: 2,289
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by ronaldhanko
Ramon is correct. Oncidumnia Carnival Costume is a hybrid of a Tolumnia which is not a mule ear, but an equitant (completely different leaf) and a a thin-leaved Oncidium which has larger bulbs proportionally and much finer leaves than a mule-ear.
|
Ah, I see. I knew that it was a Tolumnia hybrid, but I think my reasoning was faulty. I was thinking that Mule Ear applied to the physical appearance of the plant, rather than depending on certain species in it's background.
Glad I got that clarified!
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:49 PM.
|