Scaphyglottis radiata
Login
User Name
Password   


Registration is FREE. Click to become a member of OrchidBoard community
(You're NOT logged in)

menu menu

Sponsor
Donate Now
and become
Forum Supporter.

Scaphyglottis radiata
Many perks!
<...more...>


Sponsor
 

Google


Fauna Top Sites
Register Scaphyglottis radiata Members Scaphyglottis radiata Scaphyglottis radiata Today's PostsScaphyglottis radiata Scaphyglottis radiata Scaphyglottis radiata
LOG IN/REGISTER TO CLOSE THIS ADVERTISEMENT
Go Back   Orchid Board - Most Complete Orchid Forum on the web ! > >
Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 01-06-2008, 05:55 PM
nancy nancy is offline
Senior Member
 

Join Date: May 2005
Zone: 9a
Location: south Louisiana
Posts: 660
Default Scaphyglottis radiata

Greetings -
The plant is more like a clump of grass than an orchid, but the growth habit is attractive, and the flowers are cute (or would be, if I could see them!). Not a demanding plant, but not showy, either!
It was labeled'radiata' which I cannot find referenced anywhere; additionally, not sure which family would claim it. So here it is in the 'lookie-lookie' area.
Regards - Nancy
Attached Thumbnails
Scaphyglottis radiata-scaphyglotis-radiata-plant-jpg   Scaphyglottis radiata-scaphyglottis-inflorescence-jpg   Scaphyglottis radiata-scaphyglottis-single-flower-jpg  
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 01-06-2008, 09:04 PM
Rosim_in_BR Rosim_in_BR is offline
Senior Member
 

Join Date: Aug 2007
Zone: 11
Location: Sao Paulo - Brazil
Posts: 4,044
Default

Nice! I like it! Scaphyglottis form large hanging clumps here in the wild. Although small, the flowers are cute.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 01-07-2008, 04:20 AM
shakkai shakkai is offline
Senior Member
 

Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Winchester, UK
Posts: 2,993
Default

Another really interesting one, Nancy. Looks like it could be: IOSPE PHOTOS

I have one that was sold as Scaphyglottis violacea, which is now a syn. for Scaphyglottis graminifolia, however, the leaves on mine are even more 'grasslike' than what is show for that species. It hasn't flowered yet, so I haven't been able to confirm ID.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 01-07-2008, 12:38 PM
nancy nancy is offline
Senior Member
 

Join Date: May 2005
Zone: 9a
Location: south Louisiana
Posts: 660
Default

Hi Shakkai - thanks for the link - the more common species are much easier to identify, aren't they? But, of course, after reading the description of the plant in IOSPE stipitate pseudobulbs partially enveloped basally by a few, imbricate, scarious, triangular sheaths carrying 2, apical, suberect, linear, obtuse, conduplicate below into the base leaves with a bilobed apex well, I'm stumped! Clear as mud!
I do wish that the photo sites would display more of the plant itself: a little more of a clue as to the relative size of the plant in relation to the flowers, etc.
Cheers - Nancy

Last edited by nancy; 01-07-2008 at 12:38 PM.. Reason: gak!
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 01-07-2008, 05:06 PM
shakkai shakkai is offline
Senior Member
 

Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Winchester, UK
Posts: 2,993
Default

Nancy... Have a look on Flickr. There are several species there where people have better photos sometimes showing the whole plant.

Flickr: Search

I tend to always have to look up half the words in the descriptions!! They always seem clear as mud to me...

stipitate - A supporting stalk or stemlike structure
basally - at the bottom
imbricate - Having regularly arranged, overlapping edges
scarious - Thin, membranous, and dry
apical - located at the apex
suberect - not standing up straight
linear - straight
obtuse - blunt, not sharp
conduplicate - Folded together lengthwise
bilobed - divided into two lobels

I guess its true - a picture is worth a thousand words!!

Last edited by shakkai; 01-07-2008 at 05:06 PM.. Reason: Added link to photo search
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 01-07-2008, 06:29 PM
nancy nancy is offline
Senior Member
 

Join Date: May 2005
Zone: 9a
Location: south Louisiana
Posts: 660
Default

After looking at all the flickr photos, I'd say that *all* the other species are somewhat prettier than mine - HAH!
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 01-08-2008, 04:06 AM
shakkai shakkai is offline
Senior Member
 

Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Winchester, UK
Posts: 2,993
Default

Nancy, I wouldn't say that!! Your's is a cutie. And at least your's has flowered! Mine hasn't done anything but grow a couple new pseudobulbs.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 01-08-2008, 10:10 AM
nancy nancy is offline
Senior Member
 

Join Date: May 2005
Zone: 9a
Location: south Louisiana
Posts: 660
Default

Hello shakkai - the vendor I bought this from said he didn't know what the flowers were like; at the next show, I brought him an enlarged photo - my theory: flowers were too small to see!
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Tags
demanding, labeledradiata, plant, referenced, showy, radiata, scaphyglottis


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Habenaria radiata cupcake Advanced Discussion 3 01-05-2008 03:34 PM
ENCYCLIA fragrans and ENCYCLIA radiata dennis Miniatures Show & Tell 2 05-28-2007 03:51 PM
Scaphyglottis radiata - MINI!!! nancy Cattleya Alliance 7 04-26-2007 06:58 AM

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:56 AM.

© 2007 OrchidBoard.com
Search Engine Optimisation provided by DragonByte SEO v2.0.37 (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2024 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Feedback Buttons provided by Advanced Post Thanks / Like (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2024 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.

Clubs vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.