Why is this plant an Lc.?

[Eyebabe]

You are using the Sanders classification with "Lc."
My understanding is that the names have been changed to reflect more closely the issues you have described.

The current accepted name is Ctt. Mary Elizabeth Bohn.

That is about as much as know of taxonomy

[camille1585]

Originally Posted by Eyebabe

You are using the Sanders classification with "Lc."
My understanding is that the names have been changed to reflect more closely the issues you have described.

The current accepted name is Ctt. Mary Elizabeth Bohn.

That is about as much as know of taxonomy

I was figuring that it was the explanation as well. The Cattleya alliance has been so thoroughly shuffled around, divided and merged that it's a miracle that some still have the same name afterward.
I've lost track of how many labels I've had to change on various plants. Mainly changing all the Dtps. labels over to Phals. Orchidwiz has been a big help is keeping up with the name changes. The taxonomists really keep us on our toes!