Donate Now
and become
Forum Supporter.
Many perks! <...more...>
|
04-08-2010, 06:05 PM
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2010
Zone: 5b
Location: Lakewood, CO
Age: 35
Posts: 2,289
|
|
Aphrodite or Amabilis? You decide.
I KNOW there's at least one person on here who is well versed on this particular subject.
Found this beauty at a grocery store of all places a few weeks ago (I was stunned, I've never seen species there!).
The tag says "Phal. Amabilis v. formosa 'Taida Masayuki'"
I was able to track it down on the vendor's site:
????
I've looked at these pages explaining the amabilis vs. aphrodite, but I'm still on the fence.
phalaenopsis amabilis anglais
So whatcha think? I think she's stunning either way.
Having a ball in my south window- her leaves immediately perked up and turned a much nicer dark lime green.
Also- what does the formosa/formosana variation do anyways? I can't see a difference.
|
04-08-2010, 06:15 PM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2008
Zone: 9a
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 9,313
|
|
It's clearly Phal. aphrodite.
The shape of the lip is not the same.
The only analogy I can think of is the crocodile and alligator analogy.
Crocodiles have long slender snouts.
Alligators have shorter triangular snouts.
Same thing with the differences in the lip of Phal amabilis and Phal aphrodite.
Phal amabilis has a slender mid-lobe on the lip.
Phal aphrodite has a triangular mid-lobe on the lip.
There are probably other differences as well, such as the shape of the callus (the callus are the ridges on the back of the lip).
The variant formosana might have some differences in patterning and coloration from the other forms. The differences are difficult to tell apart if you don't know what to look for.
__________________
Philip
Last edited by King_of_orchid_growing:); 04-08-2010 at 06:21 PM..
|
04-08-2010, 06:20 PM
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2010
Zone: 5b
Location: Lakewood, CO
Age: 35
Posts: 2,289
|
|
Ha! That's what I THOUGHT.
So is it Aphrodite v. formosa or just plain formosa?
I LOVE the purple stripes. They remind me of fangs, or baleen. Already, this is one of my favorite orchids to photograph, second to my Ping tung gold.
|
04-08-2010, 06:23 PM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2008
Zone: 9a
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 9,313
|
|
It would be Phal. aphrodite var. formosana.
Don't capitalize the species name. It's not a hybrid.
__________________
Philip
|
04-08-2010, 06:25 PM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2008
Zone: 9a
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 9,313
|
|
I was thinking things through, and the formosana variant might also have slight differences in the shape of the petals and the sepals compared to the other variants.
__________________
Philip
|
04-08-2010, 06:32 PM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2006
Zone: 5a
Location: New Hampshire
Posts: 840
|
|
Phal amabilis, amabilis var. formosanum, aphrodite and formosanum are all synonyms for each other. The term var. usually means that there is a characteristic that is slightly different from others in the same species. Examples: var. coerulea indicates a blue flower; flava indicates yellow. Var. can also indicate the geographic location where the plant is found.
Your plant is lovely - what a great find!
|
04-08-2010, 06:54 PM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2008
Zone: 9a
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 9,313
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by cneos
Phal amabilis, amabilis var. formosanum, aphrodite and formosanum are all synonyms for each other. The term var. usually means that there is a characteristic that is slightly different from others in the same species. Examples: var. coerulea indicates a blue flower; flava indicates yellow. Var. can also indicate the geographic location where the plant is found.
Your plant is lovely - what a great find!
|
So...
Wait...
Phal amabilis and Phal aphrodite are the same species?
Did they [orchid taxonomists] re-order the two species as variants of each other, rather than classify them both as separate and distinct species based on recent DNA findings?
To my understanding, Phal amabilis and Phal aphrodite were always considered two separate species. Is this no longer the case?
Are you able to cite the information where Phal aphrodite and Phal amabilis are now considered the synonyms of each other and that they're merely just variants of one another?
__________________
Philip
Last edited by King_of_orchid_growing:); 04-08-2010 at 07:01 PM..
|
04-08-2010, 07:08 PM
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2010
Zone: 5b
Location: Lakewood, CO
Age: 35
Posts: 2,289
|
|
Hahaha, that's precisely why I asked Philip.
|
04-08-2010, 07:15 PM
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 308
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by King_of_orchid_growing:)
So...
Wait...
Phal amabilis and Phal aphrodite are the same species?
Did they [orchid taxonomists] re-order the two species as variants of each other, rather than classify them both as separate and distinct species based on recent DNA findings?
To my understanding, Phal amabilis and Phal aphrodite were always considered two separate species. Is this no longer the case?
Are you able to cite the information where Phal aphrodite and Phal amabilis are now considered the synonyms of each other and that they're merely just variants of one another?
|
It depends on the taxonomist and if you are a lumper or a splitter. Some consider aphrodite as a variant of amabilis, some consider aphrodite a separate species. I don't know that any DNA studies have been done.
Susan
|
04-08-2010, 07:17 PM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2008
Zone: 9a
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 9,313
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Izzie
Hahaha, that's precisely why I asked Philip.
|
Every site I've read so far has stated that they're distinct species and not variants of one another.
I've even picked up Steven A. Frowine's book on Phalaenopsis and he stated they're separate species not variants.
I'm not aware of any recent articles, sites, or publications that state that Phal amabilis and Phal aphrodite are one and the same species, but different variations of each other.
If there's a citation for this information, then I guess that would definitively answer the question once and for all.
__________________
Philip
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:35 AM.
|