Oh-no......came home with another Phal :0)
Login
User Name
Password   


Registration is FREE. Click to become a member of OrchidBoard community
(You're NOT logged in)

menu menu

Sponsor
Donate Now
and become
Forum Supporter.

Oh-no......came home with another Phal :0)
Many perks!
<...more...>


Sponsor
 

Google


Fauna Top Sites
Register Oh-no......came home with another Phal :0) Members Oh-no......came home with another Phal :0) Oh-no......came home with another Phal :0) Today's PostsOh-no......came home with another Phal :0) Oh-no......came home with another Phal :0) Oh-no......came home with another Phal :0)
LOG IN/REGISTER TO CLOSE THIS ADVERTISEMENT
Go Back   Orchid Board - Most Complete Orchid Forum on the web ! > > >
Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #11  
Old 10-07-2013, 05:08 AM
RosieC RosieC is offline
Senior Member
 

Join Date: Jul 2008
Zone: 8a
Location: West Midlands, UK
Age: 49
Posts: 25,462
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by l1sav View Post


I have been doing a bit of digging around on the net and came across several references with pictures to a Phalaenopsis which looks just like the one I brought home with me called 'Brown Sugar'

Not sure whether i am allowed to post links, but if u search via a suitable search engine Phaleanopsis Brown Sugar there is several links & images very much like mine.

Is that a genuine orchid Id or just one used by an orchid nursery in the Netherlands???
No problem posting links. However when I search on "Phaleanopsis Brown Sugar" I get some completely different looking ones, as well as one or two that look like yours. I guess some of these pictures are mis-tagged somewhere. Not sure which ones but in my search more of them look like this (completely different) Phalaenopsis 'Brown Sugar'

Even if it does look like one of these, there are so many hybrids of Phals that look the same that you can't be sure. What I like to do is use a name for my own records (and so the NoID's don't feel left out not having a name) but have a marker on the tag which indicates it's a NoID and then if I post photos here I tag them as NoID rather than using the name.

I don't want others using my photos of something I'm not 100% certain of the name of to identify theirs... you can't be 100% certain without genetic tests and sometimes flowers look identical in pictures but not if actually compared to each other. I have two like that... they looks identical in pictures but in real life have completely different flower sizes and growth patterns. They are both different NoID Phals but in photos could be mistaken as the same thing.

On the other hand I have two I really can't tell a difference between when both in flower next to each other... but one is named and one is a NoID. I'm 99% certain they are the same thing, but still won't use the name for the NoID when posting pictures of it as I don't know for sure.

NoIDs are just as pretty as named Phals anyway

---------- Post added at 10:08 AM ---------- Previous post was at 10:02 AM ----------

By the way, Brown Sugar is a registered hybird, it's parents are Tyler Carlson x Brown Penny, but I can't find pictures of Brown Penny and Tyler Carlson looks nothing like either yours or the Brown Sugar in my link so nothing to go on there.
Reply With Quote
Post Thanks / Like - 1 Likes
Likes Island Girl liked this post
  #12  
Old 10-07-2013, 05:35 AM
l1sav l1sav is offline
Senior Member
 

Join Date: Aug 2013
Zone: 8a
Location: Cambridgeshire, UK
Posts: 123
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by RosieC View Post
No problem posting links. However when I search on "Phaleanopsis Brown Sugar" I get some completely different looking ones, as well as one or two that look like yours. I guess some of these pictures are mis-tagged somewhere. Not sure which ones but in my search more of them look like this (completely different) Phalaenopsis 'Brown Sugar'

Even if it does look like one of these, there are so many hybrids of Phals that look the same that you can't be sure. What I like to do is use a name for my own records (and so the NoID's don't feel left out not having a name) but have a marker on the tag which indicates it's a NoID and then if I post photos here I tag them as NoID rather than using the name.

I don't want others using my photos of something I'm not 100% certain of the name of to identify theirs... you can't be 100% certain without genetic tests and sometimes flowers look identical in pictures but not if actually compared to each other. I have two like that... they looks identical in pictures but in real life have completely different flower sizes and growth patterns. They are both different NoID Phals but in photos could be mistaken as the same thing.

On the other hand I have two I really can't tell a difference between when both in flower next to each other... but one is named and one is a NoID. I'm 99% certain they are the same thing, but still won't use the name for the NoID when posting pictures of it as I don't know for sure.

NoIDs are just as pretty as named Phals anyway

---------- Post added at 10:08 AM ---------- Previous post was at 10:02 AM ----------

By the way, Brown Sugar is a registered hybird, it's parents are Tyler Carlson x Brown Penny, but I can't find pictures of Brown Penny and Tyler Carlson looks nothing like either yours or the Brown Sugar in my link so nothing to go on there.
Thanks Rosie
U r a mind of information

To be honest I'm not really bothered if my phals have an Id or not, it would be nice to know but its not the end of the world.
They r beautiful regardless....
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 10-07-2013, 11:42 AM
kindrag23 kindrag23 is offline
Senior Member
 

Join Date: Jul 2013
Zone: 8a
Location: Texas
Age: 35
Posts: 2,966
Oh-no......came home with another Phal :0) Female
Default

Looks almost exactly like mine that I got from Home Depot. It is a noid as well.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 10-07-2013, 08:53 PM
Wild Orchid Wild Orchid is offline
Senior Member
 

Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: BC
Posts: 416
Oh-no......came home with another Phal :0)
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by l1sav View Post


Not sure whether i am allowed to post links, but if u search via a suitable search engine Phaleanopsis Brown Sugar there is several links & images very much like mine.
Yes, we can post links on this forum!

Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Tags
eyes, home, nuts, partner, rolled, phal, oh-no


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Phal leaves turning dark green/purple, healthy otherwise cutie_monster Beginner Discussion 16 03-06-2024 12:45 PM
Holy crap did I get a phal. wiganiae at No Frills? let_it_grow Identification Forum 23 02-18-2013 01:59 AM
Phal. inscriptiosinensis, Phal kunstleri & Phal deliciosa Brooke Species 13 08-10-2009 07:41 PM
Newly updated orchid growing list!! share yours!! peeweelovesbooks Advanced Discussion 13 07-18-2009 02:11 PM

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:21 AM.

© 2007 OrchidBoard.com
Search Engine Optimisation provided by DragonByte SEO v2.0.37 (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2024 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Feedback Buttons provided by Advanced Post Thanks / Like (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2024 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.

Clubs vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.