Quote:
Originally Posted by calvin_orchidL
The efficiency of T5HO tubes is around 92 lumens per watt. 100 watts for a measly 8500 lumens (85/watt) seems like really crappy efficiency.
Naoki - what kind of outputs are you getting with the 100W cobs?
|
Calvin, I didn't notice your post until now. Sorry.
My measurement of 100W eBay COB vs Cree CXA3070 is in
this thread. (skip to message #18). I don't have the ability (time) to calculate the total output (micro moles/s or total lumen). But if we assume the beam spread pattern is similar, Cree CXA3070 gives about 60% more light (plant-relevant PAR) than eBay 100W COB for the same amount of energy used (watt). Bridgelux Vero 29 (pretty similar performance to your Vero 18) is pretty similar to CXA3070 (about 5% less efficient from my measurement).
Now the comparison of COB-LED vs T5HO isn't easy (point source vs linear source).
2' 24Wx4 T5HO fixture gives 160 micormoles/m^2/s at 1-foot away, and it consumes 72.6W (most T5HO seems to use less energy than the rated watt).
CXA3070 can gives 250 micro moles/m^2/s at 1' when it is using 46.2W, 340 micro moles/m^2/s with 59W.
The measurement is taken at the middle point, 1' from the fixture. T5HO has more even coverage. But if you take the average over the area, I'm guessing 46.2W LED is probably giving similar output to 72.6W.
So the common 4' 54W T5HO x 4 setting can be replaced by 2x 50W class CXA3070 or Vero 29 to cover 4'x2' area. This seems to correspond with the plant growth (just subjective comparison), too.
This will give about 40% cheaper electricity cost. It depends on the cost of electricity, but the initial cost of replacing 54Wx4 T5HO with 2x CXA3070 (about $120-150, or $100 for 2x Vero 29) can be covered by the saving in electricity within 1-2 years.
So it appears ebay 100W COB has efficiency close to T5HO, and it is not such a great deal. But the price of these eBay COB is so cheap now, it can be better than T5HO.