fluros or mh and hps
Login
User Name
Password   


Registration is FREE. Click to become a member of OrchidBoard community
(You're NOT logged in)

menu menu

Sponsor
Donate Now
and become
Forum Supporter.

fluros or mh and hps
Many perks!
<...more...>


Sponsor
 

Google


Fauna Top Sites
Register fluros or mh and hps Members fluros or mh and hps fluros or mh and hps Today's Postsfluros or mh and hps fluros or mh and hps fluros or mh and hps
LOG IN/REGISTER TO CLOSE THIS ADVERTISEMENT
Go Back   Orchid Board - Most Complete Orchid Forum on the web ! > >
Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 08-03-2010, 10:14 AM
stef666 stef666 is offline
Jr. Member
 

Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 12
fluros or mh and hps
Default fluros or mh and hps

hey there,Im just starting to build my new terrarium.Size is 1200mm (4ft)long 900 (3ft) high and 600mm (2ft) deep.Im intending to grow mostly high temp dendrobiums (bigibbum and the like) plus some vandaceous orchids)
It will be heated of course.
My question is because of the height of the enlosure what would be more suitable fluros or should i get some metal halide and hps lights.Just seems as though with fluros they may be too far away from the plants?

Any thoughts would be appreciated
cheers
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 08-03-2010, 02:09 PM
trdyl trdyl is offline
Senior Member
 

Join Date: Aug 2009
Zone: 6a
Member of:TVOS, AOS, FSoA
Location: Mountain Home, Idaho
Age: 58
Posts: 3,387
fluros or mh and hps Male
Default

With the size of your space I think you'll be fine with fluros. They will also not generate as much heat as the others listed either which is a plus.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 08-04-2010, 02:38 AM
stef666 stef666 is offline
Jr. Member
 

Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 12
fluros or mh and hps
Default fluros

So if i use the fluros how many would i need? its so easy with mh etc to say 500 watts etc but with fluros?
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 08-06-2010, 02:43 AM
trdyl trdyl is offline
Senior Member
 

Join Date: Aug 2009
Zone: 6a
Member of:TVOS, AOS, FSoA
Location: Mountain Home, Idaho
Age: 58
Posts: 3,387
fluros or mh and hps Male
Default

With the newer fluros a 4 bulb 4ft T5 fixture will give you plenty of light which would be 216 watts.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 08-06-2010, 04:20 PM
This Side of Paradise's Avatar
This Side of Paradise This Side of Paradise is offline
Senior Member
 

Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Burlington, ON
Posts: 173
fluros or mh and hps Male
Default

I have a tank that is almost the same dimensions with 5 4 foot t5 and im only getting 200fc at the bottom. If id have to do it again id get mh or hps
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 08-18-2010, 08:52 PM
stef666 stef666 is offline
Jr. Member
 

Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 12
fluros or mh and hps
Default light depth/penetration

Quote:
Originally Posted by cyberloach View Post
I have a tank that is almost the same dimensions with 5 4 foot t5 and im only getting 200fc at the bottom. If id have to do it again id get mh or hps
thats was my concern.I dont really want to have my bigibums halfway up the enclosure although i could.

I was looking at an 8 x 39 watt light (ho) which is going to give me roughly 300 watts .... but then looking around as i do i saw the cfls where i can get say 3 or 4 200 watt ones.
Do the compacts still throw enough light evenly?
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 10-04-2010, 05:20 PM
S-Smith S-Smith is offline
Jr. Member
 

Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Dalkeith, Ont
Posts: 3
fluros or mh and hps Male
Default

This is a good question, I have been pondering the use of t5's over a single 400w MH system, for my new orchid enclosure. I had been using a 600W HPS but I think it wasn't the right spectrum since my plants didn't seem to want to flower very much. I have read that since the t5's lumens are spread out along the bulb you don't get as much light penetration as a HID, also the HID still has better light output vs floros 400w=50k lumens I think, 515W of t5's equal this if I'm not mistaken. This is all speculation though I would love some real world results with both systems though to compare.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 10-05-2010, 12:09 AM
BioWheel BioWheel is offline
Member
 

Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 36
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by S-Smith View Post
This is a good question, I have been pondering the use of t5's over a single 400w MH system, for my new orchid enclosure. I had been using a 600W HPS but I think it wasn't the right spectrum since my plants didn't seem to want to flower very much. I have read that since the t5's lumens are spread out along the bulb you don't get as much light penetration as a HID, also the HID still has better light output vs floros 400w=50k lumens I think, 515W of t5's equal this if I'm not mistaken. This is all speculation though I would love some real world results with both systems though to compare.
I'm using an 8 lamp - 4 ft long T5 system for my orchids. Getting 2200 lumens at about 18 inches for my phals and 4k lumens at about 6 inches from light for Cattleya. Flowers and works nicely. Heat a bit of a problem for me in Sept (growing in garage shed) but perfect temps in the winter. Shed about 55f and box stays about 80/60f on coldest winter days.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 09-08-2011, 04:16 AM
tropterrarium tropterrarium is offline
Senior Member
 

Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 553
fluros or mh and hps
Default

Four issues have not been addressed yet:
1) Relationship of light out-put and distance of fixture to tank. If you want homogenous light from the top to the bottom of the tank, then the light source has to be further away from the tank. Remember inverse square law of light attenuation with distance. But, with greater distance you also lower overall intensity. This is a typical trade-off situation.
2) Color rendition index, i.e., how well does the artificial light match the natural sun-daylight. CRI of 100 is perfect match, regular cool white T12 is around CRI of 60, full spectrum HO fluorescent can be up to about CRI of 90, some MH are up to CRI94-96.
3) How much light do you need? Usually light requirements on culture sheets are for noon-midday, so peak intensity. But morning and evening light is lower. Artificial light is fully on or entirely off. Converting the natural light fluctuation to a square intensity function (i.e., squaring the "circle", though a parabola is the better approximation), roughly half of the culture-sheet requirement is about right for artificial light intensity.
4) What about LED's? they are up and coming in the coral reef community, and corals need A LOT of light.

I use on a 5'L x 2'H x 1'D 4x 80W 60" HO T5s. Seems to be enough, even with having all four on only for 3h a day. I do not grow very high light intensity plants (vandas etc.). If I would be in the market for a new light, I would very much look at LEDs. Don't know about their CRI.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Tags
enlosure, fluros, halide, hps, metal


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:30 PM.

© 2007 OrchidBoard.com
Search Engine Optimisation provided by DragonByte SEO v2.0.37 (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2025 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Feedback Buttons provided by Advanced Post Thanks / Like (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2025 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.

Clubs vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.