hi orcish,
I wasn't really too sure what you were trying to find out.
I think it is good to do these experiements, as the poster writes it costs $500 to get the right equipment to even do so.
I am still figuring out what light levels to use. I let the plants grow and use signs they give off to tell me if they want more or less light. It's a bit of trial and error.
I noticed they say for phals they use 70 umol/m2/s
150 umol/m2/s for medium light
300 umol/m2/s for Cattleya
450 umol/m2/s the abosulte max
2,000 umol/m2/s - Full sun
That coud be plasuible. I would estimate in the UK full sun in 1000 umol/m2/s
I've been to Australia, the sun is twice as strong then in the UK.
And even in the UK full sun is too much.
I've heard of people using 70% shade cloth. So 30% of 2000 umol/m2/s (full sun) would be 600 umol/m2/s at its peak or 450 umol/m2/s on average over the whole day.
In the UK we would only need 50% shade cloth max.
The only thing I thought strange is that they reckon phals need 4 times less light than Cattleya's
I basically don't go as accurate as the poster, havng low medium high and extra high light,
I just have high or low light.
my high light is twice as strong as my low light, not 4 times as strong so that's the only thing I thought I do a bit different but I don't know what the ideal level of lights is.
Maybe 4 times less light is accurate, maybe I need to give my Cattleya's more light than I am at the moment.
Could all be, certainly some good info in there to think about.
One thing I have found is that phals much prefer lots of low light, over a little bit of high light so they prefer lots of smaller lights giving off smaller amounts of energy over one strong light lighting up an area whereas Cattleya's like a really strong light source.
|