Donate Now
and become
Forum Supporter.
Many perks! <...more...>
|
11-27-2013, 02:44 PM
|
|
Moderator
|
|
Join Date: May 2005
Zone: 7b
Location: Queens, NY, & Madison County NC, US
Age: 44
Posts: 19,374
|
|
Sounds good for a terrarium!
__________________
"We must not look at goblin men,
We must not buy their fruits:
Who knows upon what soil they fed
Their hungry thirsty roots?"
Goblin Market
by Christina Georgina Rossetti
|
11-27-2013, 03:00 PM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2011
Zone: 7b
Location: Manhattan, NY
Age: 40
Posts: 8,411
|
|
this plant is still sold by Kawamoto Orchids of Hawaii and it a reasonable deal, not a pricy orchid. I was attracted to the color and form of the flower and fragrant at that....
|
11-27-2013, 08:09 PM
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: May 2008
Zone: 9a
Location: Nor Cal
Posts: 26,634
|
|
Nice!
|
Post Thanks / Like - 1 Likes
|
Bud liked this post
|
|
11-27-2013, 10:08 PM
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Victoria
Posts: 502
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bud
You must be right, Andrew....there is a lot of renaming and reclassification going on and I am not surprised that Cadetia is now back to Dendrobium.
|
It's an issue with how the taxonomists are interpreting the DNA evidence. Both the 'lumpers' and the 'splitters' agree that Dendrobium relatives like Cadetia, Flickingeria, Diplocaulobium etc have evolved as specialised lines within Dendrobium sensu lato. A group in Australia has argued to keep Cadetia etc and split Dendrobium up into lots of smaller genera on the basis that it's not scientific to maintain huge genera like Dendrobium whilst at the same time allowing other more closely related taxa to be split off into separate genera. Those arguing to keep Dendrobium intact based on the ICBN rules regarding conserving names and avoiding unnecessary splitting, which includes Kew, have accepted that they have to put Cadetia etc back into Dendrobium in order to keep Dendrobium monophyletic.
|
Post Thanks / Like - 1 Likes
|
Bud liked this post
|
|
11-27-2013, 10:17 PM
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Beautiful BC
Posts: 1,526
|
|
This is a very nice one, Bud.
|
Post Thanks / Like - 1 Likes
|
Bud liked this post
|
|
11-28-2013, 01:10 AM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2011
Zone: 7b
Location: Manhattan, NY
Age: 40
Posts: 8,411
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by WhiteRabbit
Nice!
|
Thank You, Sonya !
---------- Post added at 01:03 AM ---------- Previous post was at 12:58 AM ----------
Quote:
Originally Posted by Andrew
It's an issue with how the taxonomists are interpreting the DNA evidence. Both the 'lumpers' and the 'splitters' agree that Dendrobium relatives like Cadetia, Flickingeria, Diplocaulobium etc have evolved as specialised lines within Dendrobium sensu lato. A group in Australia has argued to keep Cadetia etc and split Dendrobium up into lots of smaller genera on the basis that it's not scientific to maintain huge genera like Dendrobium whilst at the same time allowing other more closely related taxa to be split off into separate genera. Those arguing to keep Dendrobium intact based on the ICBN rules regarding conserving names and avoiding unnecessary splitting, which includes Kew, have accepted that they have to put Cadetia etc back into Dendrobium in order to keep Dendrobium monophyletic.
|
That is good to know, but I still do not like Botanists who are humans that keep committing mistakes that keep on changing names and classifications....in another half century they will reclassify orchids again and rename orchids again because the head honcho of RHS found a reason to just rename orchids....just for kicks.....that is why I do not have respect for RHS and KEW=they are supposed to be top scientists of the world and they still do not get things right as simple as naming an orchid....and growers pay RHS to register the orchids they did a hybrid on. RHS have the monopoly on registering orchids and RHS do not have any competition so RHS feel they can do just about anything without any repercussion nor anyone monitoring their actions.
---------- Post added at 01:10 AM ---------- Previous post was at 01:03 AM ----------
Quote:
Originally Posted by Orchids4ever
This is a very nice one, Bud.
|
Thank You, Monika!
Last edited by Bud; 11-28-2013 at 01:21 AM..
|
05-06-2014, 08:02 PM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2011
Zone: 7b
Location: Manhattan, NY
Age: 40
Posts: 8,411
|
|
Rebloom 2014
|
05-06-2014, 09:32 PM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2010
Zone: 5b
Location: Ohio
Posts: 10,953
|
|
That is a very cute one! I have never seen it either until this post! Wow!
---------- Post added at 08:32 PM ---------- Previous post was at 08:29 PM ----------
Please just keep the taxonomists away from the herbs and fruit trees! I really don't want confusion there!
|
Post Thanks / Like - 1 Likes
|
Bud liked this post
|
|
05-06-2014, 11:42 PM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2011
Zone: 7b
Location: Manhattan, NY
Age: 40
Posts: 8,411
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Leafmite
That is a very cute one! I have never seen it either until this post! Wow!
---------- Post added at 08:32 PM ---------- Previous post was at 08:29 PM ----------
Please just keep the taxonomists away from the herbs and fruit trees! I really don't want confusion there!
|
Thank You for the visit, Leafmite !!!!
*that would be the day when taxonomists name an apple something else just cause they found a disparaging evidence in its DNA....LOL
|
05-07-2014, 04:19 AM
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2008
Zone: 8a
Location: West Midlands, UK
Age: 49
Posts: 25,462
|
|
Pretty!
|
Post Thanks / Like - 1 Likes
|
Bud liked this post
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:35 PM.
|