Paph - questionable label

[Royal]

Here's a Paph I picked up at BigBox-R-us. It does have a tag, but the same tag was in the maudiae types too. I'm calling it a NOID until I can be sure.

Tag says: (Paph Supersuk 'Eureka' AM/AOS x Paph Raisin Pie 'Hsinying') x sib.

[CoolPhrog]

I don't kno wmuch about paphs but I think this one more than most I see...Nice plant, Royal!

[whygreenberg]

Nice, Royal! Love it. I've got one of these too, though it hasn't bloomed for me yet. Regarding the name, have you checked this thread out yet? http://www.orchidboard.com/community...flowering.html

[DebsC]

I don't have a clue who she is....but I like her!!

[cowboy51278]

Just a heads up Paph Supersuk X Raisin Pie is now registered as Paph Hsinying Alien. Your picture doesn't look too much like the Hsinying Aliens that I've seen but its a cross that has been made several times so there is some variablility out there. Also being a sib cross has probably made some subtle changes. Anyhoo...thats what I know

[Roy]

I would say that the label is possibly correct. There isn't any reason that the pale coloring in your plant against the darker in others is wrong. The parentage would offer that in the genes. The dark ones usually shown attract more attention than the pale and more money, thats why yours wouldn't necessarily be seen.

[shakkai]

Royal, I like the colouring of your plant and its spots. I have a Hsinying Alien as well... see this thread: http://www.orchidboard.com/community...hs-flower.html

As Paul says is correct - there is a lot of variability in these crosses!