![]() |
Quote:
But if a deliberate cross was made between the 2 species then Guatemalensis, upper case G, no x. |
Quote:
|
2 Attachment(s)
I have this one as well, same label - first bloom for me on this one. My flowers look different from yours. I entered mine in a show in Feb an was advised that because it is a naturally occuring hybrid the plant could be entered in the species category. Found that interesting, not sure if correct technically however.
|
Our flowers do look different.
Yours are very nice also! |
Quote:
-Cj |
Or an alba aurantiaca was used. :hmm
|
1 Attachment(s)
Quote:
Beyond that, colour and shape are very skinneri. I have a guatemalensis that is pretty clearly heavily backcrossed to the aurantiaca... Regard: |
It's gorgeous.
I find all this stuff about natural hybrids and backcrossing really interesting. Have I gathered correctly that a backcrossing of a hybrid with one of it's parents is still considered to be the same hybrid name... that could lead to even wider variation in a cross that you would get just from a single mix of the two parents... I had not realised that before. |
Quote:
In cultivation, though, backcrosses are considered new hybrids. -Cj |
Thanks Cj, good to know.
So what happens if a natural hybrid is crossed with one of it's parents in cultivation rather than in the wild, does it then become a new hybrid or does it stay the same :hmm As was said above a cross between skinerii and aurantica made in cultivation gets a capital letter as a hybrid, so do crosses of guatemalensis (the natural version) and one of the parent species stay as Guatemalensis or get called something else... ... it's a coplex business isn't it ;) |
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:42 AM. |
3.8.9
Search Engine Optimisation provided by
DragonByte SEO v2.0.37 (Lite) -
vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2025 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.