During the meeting with my local society last night, the speaker(from northern Ohio)spent some time discussing how C.coccinea wouldn’t necessarily be a great choice for growers in southern Florida, so he didn’t bother bringing any for sale. That got my attention because while I don’t own a C.coccinea, I have a hybrid(Rth. Chief Glory ‘Red Ant’)that’s nearly half a C.coccinea and like 20 other species making up the rest of the background according to Orchidroots.
That hybrid(a bag baby and my first plant of the Cattleya alliance)was admittedly an impulse buy and the amount of research that went into it before I mounted it in the spring was minimal—I pretty much only looked up the parentage, confirmed it could bloom in shades of red or orange, and came to this ‘groundbreaker’ of a conclusion: if Cattleya=hot+bright and coccinea=red, then I should be good to go…high level thinking right there
Fast forward to now, and I’m still making uneducated impulse buys(see Maxillaria subsection), but I’d like to think my research has been getting better with time—I look at where the parents come from now and, if it exists, I’ll use the experience of others as a way to dial things in where I’m at.
Now with respect to that complex hybrid of mine with a lot of C.coccinea in the background: can I expect it to behave more like the C.coccinea because C.coccinea makes up the majority of the genetics or could another ancestor, despite making up a smaller slice of the genetic pie, be more dominant in what’s expressed? I might be experiencing the Mandela effect when I recall reading about C.coccinea being used to breed for smaller stature and red flowers, but if I’m not, then it seems like C.coccinea has some dominant traits, but I wonder if something invisible like temperature tolerance would be dominant or recessive or whether that tolerance is linked to something else entirely!
I just want a red Cattleya…