Microscope selection

[Jenn4a]

Thank you for the info! I had no idea what magnification is needed.
Awe.. I wish I could examine the leaves (better) without cutting them off. I was going to make it harder for myself by stacking books by a plant to sit the leaf and 'scope on.
If I don't need anything above 50x - 150x, I'm sure the "cheaper" $20-$40 digital ones will be fine. I did see some on amazon for $70+ that had higher def. camera (5MP), and a bigger range of magnification (200x- 1000x even) ... of course I was just looking around.

I'm now thinking that both a loupe and a digital microscope could be handy. Both have their pros and cons.
The loupe I'm thinking about says that one of them is 30x... but I can't back any of that up.
If I get a digital microscope, I think the Celestron 44302 2MP, (10x-40x).. and up to 150x on some monitors would be a good choice.

[wintergirl]

I did not have to cut my leaves or anything like that to use the light digital microscope. You can move the scope all over and it shows up on the computer screen. I found it easiest to "set" my lens by using a little picture they give you with the scope and dialing it in until clear. Then just put it on your leaves, being careful not to change the dial when you do this as it changes focus. It did not take me long at all to use. Here is the video of MsOrchidGirl using the gaget.

[King_of_orchid_growing:)]

For your purposes, either one is fine.

I have a handheld microscope. The magnification is pretty decent, it is more than enough for your purposes. I was able to see each individual orchid seed with a decent amount of detail with this machine. Focus is somewhat shaky. It allows you to work hands-free, but you need an awesome stand for maximum mobility. The standard stand will not cut it if you need to get at strange or awkward angles. Some machines will not come with a driver for a Mac. So if you have a Mac, you might be a bit s.o.l going this route. Be mindful of the microscope driver's compatibility, especially if you upgrade your computer frequently. Photographic ability of these machines are akin to taking a photo with your cell phone. Don't expect clear, crisp photos, with nice depth of field. Cleaning the lens is not really straightforward. They are nice to have around, but they do have their limitations. (I was glad I got one and was able to use it for as long as I have, btw. I was able to see what I've always wanted to see. They're fun to play with.)

As for the jeweler's loupes. I recommend a 30x or 40x magnification. These are good for if you want an instant look at random. You don't have to wait for a load time. Just pick it up and use. They're also dirt cheap. Cleaning is relatively easy.

If you're serious about microscopy or micrography, invest in a $1,000 - $2,000 quality stereomicroscope/dissecting microscope with camera.