I would add...
While DNA analysis is making it much easier to determine the true relationships between the living species we see (sort of a family tree), rather than the previous possibly arbitrary choice of physical characteristics, there will continue to be a certain flexibility in where the lines get drawn between taxa*. Lumper vs. splitter differences will still apply - one large genus can often be split into 2 or more smaller genera without any difference in the assessment of the relationships, or do we consider something one species with 3 varieties or 3 separate species.
Also - "family, genus, species" is only part of the formal list of taxonomic divisions that are recognized. Family, subfamily, tribe, subtribe**, genus, subgenus, species, subspecies, variety, form are all possible. In the family tree analogy, each of those is a potential branching point in the tree. Whether we consider a branch point to mark a genus vs. a subgenus, a species vs. a subspecies, is where the lumper/splitter difference can always come in, even if we agree 100% on the branches of the tree.
So a "new" genus can happen anytime the understanding of the relationships changes (the shape of the tree) based on new evidence, or anytime a different branch point on the tree is considered important. Saying that isn't scientific shows a lack of understanding of the process of science.
*[Taxa (singular: taxon) is a term for a taxonomic division at any level. Species, genus and family are all examples of taxa.]
**[Alliance is an informal term that is often parallel to subtribe or part of a subtribe.]
Last edited by PaphMadMan; 01-18-2015 at 11:57 AM..
|