If the medium is appropriately coarse and porous (i.e., lots of air flow though it), pot size is irrelevant when it comes to phals. In fact, in my experience with them in s/h culture, phalaenopsis plants in larger pots do better than those in smaller ones.
The reason we have two different schools-of-thought here is probably due to the choice of medium.
Most traditional media have components that vary in particle size. When we use them, the medium particles fill the voids between the coarse ones, and the fine particles fill in the even smaller voids. When we water, the liquid is both absorbed and held as droplets between particles ("bridging" water) by surface tension. The bridging water effectively closes off the free air flow and gas exchange to & from the roots.
If we use a small pot, it dries faster, so that bridging water goes away and all is well. In a larger pot that dries a lot more slowly, it hangs around long enough to suffocate the roots.
If, on the other hand, the medium components are all similarly-sized, the voids are larger, and the bridging water is only occupies the crevices close to the particle contact points, and the airways are still open, so drying rate - or not drying at all, as in semi-hydro culture - is irrelevant.
Here's some more on that, with pictures to make it clearer:
Particle Packing