Hi Stephen,
that is very true.
I have made some conclusions based on the information provided in this post already which are just my conclusions but I will add them on. There I am saying I don't want theories and here I am adding on my theories
.
I think the rest cattleya's require is more a change in light hours, temperatures go down in winter and as a couple people said as a result plants tend to drink less in these conditions, the grower should adapt to these conditions but not have it marked in the calendar as an exact requirement. I think based on growers having success giving a dry period or not is a good indicator to support my thinking. Also you would expect the C Walkeriana to be the most likely one to require a drier winter but at least most agree it does not need it here.
Taking that belief over to what I posted about the Cattleya schilleriana we know that providing a dry rest over summer means the plant only produces one growth that year over winter which flowers in spring.
Providing a dry winter rest instead which is what brook recommended in this thread as far as she said resulted in the plant producing a pseudobulb over summer, no bulb over winter and rest instead and then flower from the bulb it produced the year earlier in spring time the following year.
According to the grower from the AOS article providing no rest at all will result in 2 growths in a year, one in summer and one in winter but the summer one will be too poor to flower sapping energy from the winter bulb.
Ok but what if his summers were just too hot that he only got good flowering after winter? I can provide sheltered summers, what if one could keep the plant in a mild climate all year so it doesn't suffer heat stress could it then produce 2 good bulbs in a year and flower from both of them, thus flowering twice as good instead of poorly as he suggested, possibly due to detrimental conditions over summer?