Quote:
Originally Posted by joeytiii
The plant was inside in non A/c home with very little light. When it finished blooming, I put it out on the porch so it could get more air flow. I realize the roots are not getting much flow and the leaves have been in nice shape until the Kieke started growing. It seems in three days time the leaf has turned to that dark russet.
|
It is really, really, hard to keep one isolated orchid of any kind thriving indefinitely. The plant was inside with very little light and, sorry to say, that's when most of the problems began. No matter what you did after that you were going to see decline in the plant.
My parents live in South Florida and I have seen them kill Phal's by placing them in a spot where 6" to the left or right would have made the difference to their survival. Because of the way light behaves, it really matters how you place them. You need SOME direct sun, but not too much and not too little. Sometimes we need a friend with the knack to come over and say "put it there", "or there", but "not there".
So ... 'what's going on with my Phal?'. To me, it isn't the Peat Moss or Sphag. The plant was raised in that medium and reached blooming size in that medium. It is not the potting medium. It could be the watering frequency but watering frequency follows from light level and temperature. I would assume temperatures to be within range for Phal's in Puerto Rico. So ...
The light. That's where it's at as I see it. "Phal's are 'low light' orchids" is drummed into all of us. But what is 'low light' to the human eye is 'total darkness' to most plants. Humans see just fine down to 150 footcandles and less. A Phal really needs 2,000. Why 2,000FC? Because it's only going to get that for a couple of hours. 2000FC is very, very, bright light to the human eye. You can see a distinct shadow of your hand when you pass it between the light source and your orchid or a sheet of white paper placed where your orchid will be.
I just bought
this light. It is available in a single head version for much less money. I don't have any Phal's but I think 2'+ under this light would work well for a safe distance. You could light a LOT of Phals with just the one head. 35W. That is just amazing. An old fashioned lightbulb of 35W would be very, very dim. In my opinion this lamp is not overkill for a single orchid you care about, but it is easier to justify the expense of it when there are more plants. When a reliable way of lighting exists, like this lamp, a Phal can thrive with just 1000FC x 12+ hours every day. Regardless of what other natural light is available, I would (and do) have a plant lamp to do the heavy lifting of supplying light energy. Our homes are just not constructed to use enough of it effectively enough to suit an orchid and most other houseplants.
r.