Donate Now
and become
Forum Supporter.
Many perks! <...more...>
|
04-19-2008, 11:14 AM
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Brooklyn, NY
Age: 46
Posts: 1,671
|
|
To what alliance do Sarcochilus belong?
Hey there all! This is just a quick little question, mainly out of curiosity. I've seen conflicting info in various places online. Some say Vandaceous, some say Pleuro, I even saw one say Phal. I know that in the forums here, Sarcs are listed under the Pleuro alliance. But are there other monopodial pleuros?
yvan
|
04-19-2008, 11:25 AM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2006
Zone: 9a
Location: Spring Hill, FL
Posts: 17,222
|
|
According to Orchidwiz, they're in the Vandaceous group.
|
04-19-2008, 11:42 AM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Oak Island NC
Posts: 15,166
|
|
Yep.
SUBFAMILY Epidendroideae, TRIBE Vandeae, SUBTRIBE Aeridinae
|
04-19-2008, 12:02 PM
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Sydney
Posts: 609
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ray
Yep.
SUBFAMILY Epidendroideae, TRIBE Vandeae, SUBTRIBE Aeridinae
|
ALLIANCE Phalaenopsis
Speaking of which, 'Sarconopsis' (Phalaenopsis x Sarcochilus) seems like a really interesting mix... anyone seen one in flower? Maybe they have enough cool-grown Sarc in them to mount one outside
|
04-19-2008, 01:16 PM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2006
Zone: 9a
Location: Spring Hill, FL
Posts: 17,222
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Undergrounder
ALLIANCE Phalaenopsis
Speaking of which, 'Sarconopsis' (Phalaenopsis x Sarcochilus) seems like a really interesting mix... anyone seen one in flower? Maybe they have enough cool-grown Sarc in them to mount one outside
|
OW has it as Vandaceous (excluding Phalaenopsis)
Last edited by cb977; 04-19-2008 at 01:26 PM..
|
04-19-2008, 01:39 PM
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Brooklyn, NY
Age: 46
Posts: 1,671
|
|
Partly what confused me was that here on the OB, in the list of alliance forums, Sarcs are listed at the Pleuro alliance forum.
IOSPE also lists as Tribe: Vandae
|
04-19-2008, 07:07 PM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2008
Zone: 9a
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 9,313
|
|
Vanda alliance. Without question. Pleurothallids are mostly New World orchids. Vandas are mostly Old World.
Sarcochilus spp. grows as a monopodial-sympodial. Pleurothallids grow as sympodials.
|
04-19-2008, 07:11 PM
|
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2008
Zone: 9a
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 9,313
|
|
Also another way to figure it out is that most Pleurothallids especially Restrepias, Acronias, Pleurothallis, and Ancipitua have the two lateral sepals fused to form what is called a synsepal.
Vandaceous flowers don't have a synsepal, especially so with Sarcochilus spp.
|
04-19-2008, 10:27 PM
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: subtropical SE Qld Australia
Age: 42
Posts: 241
|
|
yeah definitely Vandaceous monopodial (Vanda tribe). Closest to Phalaenopsis and Aerides i think.
|
04-20-2008, 06:26 AM
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2006
Zone: 10a
Location: Geelong, Victoria
Age: 56
Posts: 2,479
|
|
Yep Vanda alliance. No chance of it being a Pleuro.
I have seen a few Sarcanopsis when judging. They are very attractive flowerings as well. Not sure what the exact background of the particular hybrids were but they are like a Sarcochilus but on steroids as far as colour and size goes.
If I see some at the shows this year I will post here for you to see.
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:49 AM.
|