Quote:
Originally Posted by Shadeflower
We all know Ray can't do math... Most of his figures are just copied from other sources. Literally copy his website info into google to see where the info originally came from but that is another subject entirely. To think that makes someone good at math is laughable.
|
Wow - you must be off your meds again. You go into "attack mode" unprovoked and become an insulting ass because YOU don't understand the math I offered a couple of comments ago.
Your "real ratio", by the way, is laughable and clearly demonstrates your ignorance:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Shadeflower
The real ratio was in fact 0.3 ml per liter of fertilizer to 0.2g of Magnesium Nitrate or a ratio of
3 to 2 for fertilizer to magnesium nitrate.
|
First of all, you equate a volume with a mass without having the slightest idea of the density of the liquid fertilizer, but I'll make the assumption that you're "close enough" on that. We were talking nitrate content (0.4% by weight of the fertilizer), not total nitrogen, but even if the density was 1 g/ml, adding 0.3ml/L results in a nitrate contribution of 0.003 x 0.004 = 0.000012g nitrate/L. Your recommended 0.2g magnesium nitrate contributes 0.002 x 0.105 = 0.00021 g nitrate/L, giving you a grand total of 0.000222g/L, or 0.022 % nitrate - a far cry from the 7.8% that was sought.
You must really be obsessed with me, making you nothing short of pitiful. You dredge up and old thread, and use it as an excuse to attack me. I'm awfully glad you're across the pond or I might have to take out a restraining order on you. I know the moderators here have done the equivalent by blocking your access several times, but you use IP spoofing and have created several personae to come back again to satisfy your obsession. You really should get professional help.
Concerning the info on my website, the stuff I post on my website might be original, might be restated in a way that is intended to be more friendly to others, or I might have made a mistake (Oh shit! Unlike you, I admit when that happens.). You will also sometimes find bits of text that I replicated because it was so clear, there was no reason to state it differently. I have also found my own work replicated in other websites, so what's the big deal? Are you certain the stuff you find on Google didn't originate with me? I don't care one way or another, as it's all sharing of information, which makes us all more knowledgeable. (Except you, maybe, judging by your history of responses.)
Think of a website as being a local library. You are interested in a particular subject, and you have been satisfied with info you've gotten there in the past, so you go back there, rather than to a different library, elsewhere, and it's nice to find the new info you wanted so easily accessible. Sort-of like the same book being on the shelves to more than one library branch - when did they start doing that????
Linear Mode
