I'm also an equal opportunity orchid abuser, but a more subtle one than I was twenty years ago. Had enough demise in my early years to teach me at least certain broad categories of orchids I wanted but not charmed enough to struggle meeting a consensus with their needs vs my culture.
Agreed, the cool/warm/intermediate/hot classifications are a good guideline for some of genus, the "easier" growers. But one wants a certain plant, and it's expensive, better get some research done before setting up for disappointment. I'm fortunate, or unfortunate, enough that my climate varies greatly. My preference is everything outside in summer, and of course all goes inside in winter.
I find myself with less orchids that are truly cool growers, because I want everything outside for six months and some just can't take the abuse. Same thing with some of the hot growers. They're in the Batcave in winter, which isn't much warmer than my living quarters. Then I grow some "cool" and a couple of "hot" orchids that seem to fit in just fine.
Bottom line... if I see something I really like and it's inexpensive (under $50) I get it. But I have to REALLY like it already. If it's over that, homework time.
The growing temps are similar to some classifications of high light, low light, medium light. A guideline, but only that. And then one has to put the two together to make it really work. Aiieeeyiiiiyiii.
---------- Post added at 10:13 AM ---------- Previous post was at 10:10 AM ----------
Quote:
Originally Posted by Roberta
... maybe there should be a category "N" for those.
|
Interesting... and too bad more orchid retailers don't do the same. It would help. To me, "N" would be perfect... that would be a "No Go" in my book.