Thanks Steve and PMM! I was just following somebody's arcticle from this link here ----- where they used the term tri-lobe or three-lobe for describing the entire labellum.
The Bifoliate Cattleyas
Beginner's Handbook - XVIII
It looks like that writer has a category for number of lobes on the labellum ... such as three-lobe, and then they split it up into the two side lobes, and the middle lobe (or mid-lobe).
If it were me describing it, I'd put it into a quad-lobe category. Because the mid-lobe could be considered to be two lobes in itself if there happens to be a prominent notch on the front of the lip. So --- two side-lobes, and left-half of 'mid-lobe', and right-half of 'mid-lobe'. But I have no problem with just lumping those two halves together as 1 mid-lobe.
If no notch at the front-side of the lip, then I'd just put it into a plain three-lobe category. I know that going to '4-lobe' could be over the top though.
So side-lobes (2 of them) and mid-lobe is nice and simple for describing a labellum.
For the flower pic I posted, there is a significant gap in the region between each side-lobe and the mid-lobe. And Steve put in a nice description about the mid-lobe being notched centrally. Thanks for helping with understanding how to describe these particular features! I definitely learned a lot here. Thanks Steve and PMM!