Donate Now
and become
Forum Supporter.
Many perks! <...more...>
|
12-11-2007, 12:48 AM
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Jacksonville, Fla USA
Posts: 740
|
|
Using enough water to disolve and wash away salt periodically also consumes water doesnt it?
|
12-11-2007, 01:58 AM
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 606
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by orchids3
Using enough water to disolve and wash away salt periodically also consumes water doesnt it?
|
Certainly it does. However, in this case, it usually takes the place of one watering so I imagine that it doesn't utilize significantly more water than it would take to create enough RO to just water them.
|
12-24-2007, 11:48 PM
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2007
Zone: 5a
Location: Dover, New Hampshire, USA
Posts: 207
|
|
Here in New Hampshire, esp in this season and in these recent days, I just go out, scoop up some more fresh fallen snow and let it melt. Repeat as needed. Fresh, clean water!!
|
12-26-2007, 01:32 PM
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Jacksonville, Fla USA
Posts: 740
|
|
Chuckle, When I retired in Connecticut I tied a snow shove to the front of my car and drove south until noone knew what it was - thats were I stayed.
|
12-26-2007, 01:36 PM
|
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2006
Zone: 5a
Posts: 9,277
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by nhman
Here in New Hampshire, esp in this season and in these recent days, I just go out, scoop up some more fresh fallen snow and let it melt. Repeat as needed. Fresh, clean water!!
|
That's too funny! I tried that once, but at 10% moisture, it takes 50 "gallons" of snow to make the 5 gallons of water I use each watering. Since many of mine are watered daily, I would have zero snow build up by spring!
|
06-06-2009, 09:08 AM
|
Jr. Member
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 1
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ross
Reverse Osmosis water has been discussed here, nearly to death. But one factor that comes up a lot is that it may be "wasteful", in some folks eyes.
I did a pretty exhaustive search on the web this afternoon, and based on what I came up with, plus my personal knowledge having used R.O. water for years, I came up with:
1) RO is wasteful - well it appears, that may or may not, be the case depending on where you live and the type of unit you install. According to this web site: About.com: http://www.osmonics.com/products/page833.htm , reverse osmosis systems are often pressure systems that appear (to me) to have little waste. That is the case with Culligen systems and lots of commercial Home Depot style systems as well.
2) "Waste" may be a relative thing, depending on where you live. I personally live in one of the Great Lakes States where water seems to be in abundance. If I am not in error, several of the lower mid-west states' Governors recently tried a maneuver to get a canal dug to drain water from Lake Michigan to the Mississippi River to allow barges to float! This might be a definition of waste. So if water is pressed though a membrain and a certain amount is cast off to "go down the drain" - where does that water go? In my case (and most others) it goes back to the source. In my case, that is back to ground water. In the case of the Floridians enjoying RO water, that is the gulf or the Atlantic - slightly higher in salt.
3) Lots of people here seem to be struggling with how to best get water to their orchids in the highest quality within their means. RO is very affordable and very earth friendly. I only hope this thread serves to start a meaningful discussion with backed-up evidence.
|
Thanks a lot for sharing your views on Reverse Osmosis water.I hope this information helps.
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:01 PM.
|