Quote:
Originally Posted by libby
Ray - Is it possible that once the back bulbs are separated, the front can spend more of its energy producing new growth since it doesn't have to support that back growth any more? Same thing with phals - if I remove a couple of old leaves, it begins a growth spurt. I don't mean to be argumentative, but this has been my observation. I guess there are different ways of looking at most anything.
|
Of course it's possible, but it doesn't seem logical to me that a plant would continue to "carry" growths that were not contributing anything - it would be a waste of resources.
Don't forget that all God's creatures (except people, apparently) have a driving force - above all else - to live and to carry on the gene pool. Continuing to support parts of the plant that "drain" resources doesn't fit that at all, but resurrecting a dormant eye after a rhizome break certainly does.
If, after the back-bulbs were cut free, the active part of the plant immediately started multiple leads, I might agree more with your interpretation, but it's usually a dormant eye on the back-bulbs that revives and grows.
Addressing Cattleya17's comments, I agree that single- or multiple leads is usually more of a genetic-controlled issue. What I was (apparently poorly) trying to say is that if a plant is genetically predisposed to multiple leads, but isn't doing that, THAT is an indication of a cultural issue.
Also, don't sweat the "argumentative" stuff. Seems to me that's part of the reason we all are here, so we can compare our ways of looking at things for the betterment of all! That is, by the way, why I began my earlier response with "Uh-oh. Here I go again.", so you'all could brace yourselves for my comments.